Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"Looks like we got ourselves a thinker!" (Score 1) 412

American dream (as perceived from outside): if you work hard, you are going to be successful no matter how stupidly -as opposed to smart- you work.
I might be wrong, but I feel that the majority of mid-class americans are incurable dreamers (or were bitten by the tsetse fly... many times over).
It's not quite wrong (after all some believe hope is a basic human right), even if it doesn't do them - the dreamers - any lasting and concrete good.

I guess a lot of Americans hate smart people, don't they?

It's only human to be upset when disturbed (however lightly) from a wet dream, isn't it? I mean, one worked hard and climbed towards the climax... only to be denied of it.

Comment Re:First, Understand Peering (Score 2) 535

I believe Network Neutrality legislation will do more harm than good. Quality of service and IP transit costs are governed by complex market forces today.

You may be or may not be right about the complexity. However... as a paying customer for Internet service, why should dealing with this complexity be my concern?
You really think Network Neutrality will destroy the Internet? I'm rather inclined to think that there are technical solutions and there will be carriers willing to implement them and continue to survive.

I highly recommend 'The 2014 Internet Peering Playbook' by William B. Norton.

Maybe, just maybe... it is actually the carriers that should read it and find the solutions the consumers need/want?

Comment Re:Google spamming (Score 1) 52

Isn't this called search engine spamming, and several publishing outfits have been doing it for about a decade, with varying degree of success?

While it may be SEO spamming, I'm inclined to see this as an attempt to outsource the cost of indexing.:
On the line of: "You fools, I have a trove of papers you are drooling for. What about... I'll let you index it by whatever your brilliant minds discover it works the best for you, then I'll use it to increase the value of my trove"

Comment Re:To be fair... (Score 1) 398

Not true!

Getting cocaine to rub over the bills to enhance their authenticity requires hanging out in some dodgy neighbourhoods.
That is what stops me from doing it. :P

If you don't hang out in these neighborhoods, a sincere good luck in the Muhhamad/mountain dillema (avoiding them coming in and hanging you out).

Comment Re:BS (Score 1) 342

As a matter of rule, the U.S. can always pay back its debts by printing enough money to cover that debt.

True. And while US politicians might not give a damn whether the Chinese hate us, that would devalue huge amounts of debt held by US retirees, banks, and small investors, and they do vote.

I meant to say that taxes don't actually fund expenditures since the government can print money to pay for any expenditures it authorizes.

Printing money is, effectively, a tax on everybody who happens to hold money.

No wonder the conservatives fight as hard as possible to "starve the beast" even when doing so straves everybody else: after all, they are ahead in the race and don't like to be given a handicap.

Comment Re:BS (Score 1) 342

Mod parent +Informative, please. Thanks for posting it.
Seven Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy is absolutely gorgeous.
Not flawless (better said... not a complete exploration of the consequences), but an eye opener on what "fiat money" is, why is not an absolute evil and how to look at it in a non-dogmatic faith-based way.

Slashdot Top Deals

We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids? -- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission

Working...