I should qualify I was also unable to find other papers published by Zollo through google.com/scholar that the networkworld post could have sourced.
Has anyone else tried to pull the original source material? I can't find the MIT release, and this paper linked to from the bottom of the networkworld article* doesn't seem to have the information I'm looking for. The skeptic in me wanted to find out 1.) what they chose for 'risk' model behavior - the 4 arm bandit choice between 4 slot machines with different pay out ratios; 2.) how they operationalized risk - 'explorative' behavior was when they chose a different slot machine from the previous trial, and 'exploitative' when they chose the same slot machine as the previous trial; and perhaps most important to me 3.) how they classified a manager vs an entrepreneur. Could not find anything about that in the methods section. A keyword search for 'entrepreneur' returns the first hit in the analysis section when they describe performing a (presumably post-hoc) test on the locus coeruleus in entrepreneurs. No real justification, or qualifications......
Also of concern is that their subject pool was drawn from managerial experience in the diverse fields of "marketing, human resources, production, R&D, or finance." As a scientist, I'm not well versed in the business world, but how similar do y'all think decision making in these fields might be?
*http://www.croma.unibocconi.it/wps/wcm/connect/3e3146804cadaef7a443fc0f7bdc7be0/laureiro_12-02.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&useDefaultText=0&useDefaultDesc=0
If that's the case, why not just publish at an open-access site?
Because that site isn't peer reviewed. As we can see, peer review isn't the unblemished pillar we hold it up to be. But as a grad student whose adviser doesn't often check my work, peer review can be the only thing standing between me publishing a mistake and actually catching it. That being said, there are several open access sites that are peer reviewed. And in support of open access, the University of California, San Diego recently started a fund for researchers where it will pay for the fees for one open access submission per year.
forget the stains, acidic drinks pull calcium off of your teeth
Not once in any Star Wars movie does someone pick up a book or newspaper, magazine, literary journal, or chapbook handmade by an aspiring Jawa poet. [...]As early as the 1990s-era expanded Star Wars books and comic books, we’re introduced to ancient Jedi “texts” called holocrons, which are basically talking holographic video recordings. Just how long has the Star Wars universe been reliant on fancy technology to transfer information as opposed to the written word? Is it possible that a good number of people in Star Wars are completely illiterate?
Read the whole thing,
Function reject.