Right. Unfortunately the Slashdot Editors seem to have started editing (I can see why the trolls keep complaining that this place is going downhill) and deleted my my sarky suggestion to use tor from my submission.. If you want to do anything from work you wouldn't want to know then make sure you use someone else's IP address to do it from. Alternatively buy an Android tablet and a data subscription.

Your statement is a bit of a dodge and I guess you mean a fairly large group of countries when you say "one of" however it's still pretty misleading. It all depends what and how you try to measure, but the USA is no longer nearly at the top of most lists and it really isn't that free in practice. Look at the world press index and you will see the USA comes in 32nd this year, up from 47th (mostly because other countries did more bad things recently). Look even at the "Index of Freedom In the World" which seems pretty biased towards the kind of economic freedom the US is so famed for and you will see that the US isn't in the top five. Try sorting by "personal freedom" separately from "economic freedom" and you will see that it isn't even in the top 20.

The situation is not terrible and the fact that Americans still believe they are free and believe in freedom is actually a cause for hope, however if people don't start acting now to keep that freedom there is going to be a big problem. Most of all the fact that people just don't seem worried by giving up their freedom to big companies and their data to the government is really dangerous.

Things are definitely changing in many ways. Certainly the USA is getting a bit scary in the level of monitoring. However I don't think that's the thing that changed here. Remember though what was done to Charlie Chaplin and company. Snowdon is hardly the first US dissident.

What's new about this is the total level of apparent visible incompetence involved. The fundamental rule of being Russia and China is "never do anything you don't want to do if the USA states openly that you you have to do it". Their entire world power comes from the feeling of other countries that if you have one or both of them your side then you may be able to stand up to the USA and do what you want in your own country. The moment American politicians started threatening Russia and China about asylum there was nothing they could do to avoid helping him. Even weirder because think if the dissidents which the US embassy helps in China and used to help in the USSR.

Given everybody knows this, then the main thing was to get to him in Hong Kong and promise safe passage to a friendly neutral country like Iceland where there would be a chance to limit leakage of damaging material that didn't show illegal activity. They could probably wait a few years, give him an offer of a plea bargain (20 years?) and have the Icelandic winter drive him home. Why the hell drive him to Russia, the country most likely to know what to do with whatever secret information he has?

I'm going to interpret "out of" to mean "picking up passengers from" not "having an office in" and "requisite fees and having the proper licenses" to mean "without paying the special airport fee" but that you may have to be a registered taxi. If you meant something different please ask again more clearly.

In which case I will answer that I don't know of one where you can't. In some such as London, where you pay #50 just to get into a taxi you would be insane to do anything other than have a "mini-cab" (these are registered, but with much lighter requirements than a proper taxi) arranged to come and meet you. You just have to do the arrangement by phone. What that cannot be done is for those taxis to wait in a taxi rank.

This is a good example of a regulation which is done for the good of the customer. In many airports there used to be serious cowboy taxis who would wait for tourists and overcharge them massively by driving around a long long route or simply by having outrageous hidden charges or by various other kinds of fraud. By regulating and ensuring that the taxis that stand outside the airport are known, that doesn't happen much any more. The locals then take the cheaper local taxis which come and pick them up at pre-arranged places so this doesn't cause much overcharging.

The Heathrow's #50 service fee is a perfect example of a failure of democracy. The airport authority has a monopoly on air transport and even so is allowed to get away with doing whatever they want. This is one example of why I said "most of Europe" rather than "in Europe".

This is still largely true. Nothing is perfect and you shouldn't expect it to be. If you have a problem with a regulation then try to get it changed. If the majority of people agree with you that it's a bad rule and you still can't, then start thinking about how to change your political system. If they think it's a good rule but are wrong then start thinking about how to educate them. If you can't do either then you have a problem.

There are plenty, so really if you don't know about them then it's for you to Google. Here's a random list for the Lumia 900 alone to get you started

• Purple screen - Grays appear with a purple hue...
• Vibrate feature rattles / Lumia 900s often sounding like an electric razor
• Inline remote on headset issue

Just some from the first Nokia quality information out of Google. There's another they list Camera button won't wake the phone - but I don't see why they don't put that down to software quality? Apart from these you will want to look at Lumia 800

• battery problems (probably software-hardware integration; should certainly have been picked up in the production facility).
• Recalls (e.g. T-mobile)

It's worth just having a look through dicussions like this one where you can just feel the astroturfers being drowned in a sea of sadness.

The real full picture is known only to Nokia of course and is well hidden for good reasons.

Now to be honest, these kinds of problems and complaints are pretty standard levels for second rank manufacturers. You need the high volume of Samsung or Apple to be able to get the manufacturing fully tuned. The main reason this is an issue is that Nokia used to be the best of the best.

Sure; however most of their top end phones were in their own plants and the ones needing the most supervision would always be done in Finland first. If you don't think that direct contact between the factory and the development engineers is critical to optimization then you haven't understood why Apple has to take such a control-freak attitude to their suppliers. Nobody except Apple and Samsung can afford that nowadays. In the old days, Nokia could use their own factories to build and optimize quality. Then, as a phone design became old hat, they could outsource the production whilst knowing everything they needed to to ensure that their suppliers kept up the quality they needed.

In most of Europe yes; the regulations are there in order to improve people's lives and especially safety. It is true that, in some places, people are able to change the regulations for their own profit or in ways that interfere with business. That is a symptom of failing democracy not that regulations are always bad. Your first priority must be to change your politicians. After that; once you have politicians who are trying to limit the regulations to the ones that actually matter, then is the time to start reducing the regulation which is getting in your way for no benefit.

Very often, the alternative to regulations which make it clear what needs to be done and what is just an optional extra is lawsuits, which are even more costly.

What I have seen is multiple attempts to portray him as a liar which turned out to be PR people propaganda. "Elop never said that.... oh shit Helsinkin Suomat had a recording; uhhh.. we didn't mean 'liar' just that he misunderstood". "no no, the operators love Skype. Oh that statement in the SEC filing, well yes, when we say 'love' we really mean 'love to hate'" and so on. I've seen things like "well look, the way he calculated the N9 numbers is wrong" coming from people who actually had the numbers and so would have just said something if the numbers he gave were too big. People are pouring over every word Tommi writes looking for something they can twist against him. After that, anyone who wants to claim Tommi is a liar needs to not only point to an untrue statement but to show hard evidence that he made it deliberately and that he knew 100% that it was untrue at the time he said it. There are even special slander sites (see the links provided by the astroturfing trolls in some zero scored other responses to my comments) set up especially to attack Tommi. If there wasn't much truth in what Tommi said, then the PR people would just ignore him.

I'm pretty sure we have discussed before and you are a legitimate and open Nokia employee. I'm pretty happy to agree to disagree with you since I'm 100% sure you are subject to a weird world of propaganda and no longer know truth from lies. This comment, however, is unacceptable and a clear part of a widespread smear campaign. That your comments are so similar to the astroturfer's is especially disturbing. My comment is either true or false. Who I choose to link to does not affect my credibility unless you show me that I should know he's liar (I do not) and that this particular statement is a lie (it is not; the links from Tommi's article are clear). If that were true you could simply show it and convince the others. Instead you choose to attack the messenger's messenger. As seen now, this can only be an attempt to silence a voice which is giving an uncomfortable message. Either point out the specific lies or stop this slander.

If your involvement with Microsoft is doing this to your ethics then please think about the old values of the company you loved and leave. Once upon a time the people who worked for Nokia were mostly good people. There are plenty of other companies out there where that is still true. There is no need to sell your soul for a pathetically small bit of Redmond's Danegeld.

Microsoft themselves have admitted to Windows phone being 18 months behind, especially in apps. This was even covered earlier on Slashdot. Go and look at reviews of Windows which cover the apps market; developers are simply not fixing or updating the Windows versions because there aren't enough customers to justify it. This leaves old buggy software where iOS and Android have the latest and best.

Most of the Major phone "manufacturer's" have no manufacturing capability anyway. They just buy from "noname" contract manufacturing plants (like Foxconn to name one). There are exceptions; companies like Samsung which are large enough, and companies like Apple which can afford to get involved in financing of production; but the rest mostly gave up their factories in the last few years and the change seems to have been one of the reasons for all problems that showed up in the Nokia Lumia phones after they closed their factories in Finland.

This means that a bunch of companies will just put together the device you order. This has been done by, for example, many of the phone companies to get custom devices for their networks (which is where HTC actually came from before they started to be a known brand).

There is no reason to think that, especially if they are willing to put some finance up themselves, Canonical wouldn't be able to do this too.

You can use your credit card, but at least in some locations they start blocking this after a few times. Anyone know how to do this reliably every time?

The opposite. It's a fundamental principle that authors and designers of the trusted computing base are trusted and so have to be trustworthy. The typical standard is that for high security applications that means that all of the people involved have to have full security clearance; that means they have to be nationals of the country where they are working or a NATO allies at the very least. In their high security applications the spy agencies should probably only use computers where every component and every part of the design follows those criteria.

This is exactly it. Everything is a mixture of innuendo and misunderstanding. What it all comes down to is "you can't trust your computer to be made properly" which we all should have known originally and "the person who designed your computer has a good chance to insert a backdoor" which we should also know and "the UKUSA security groupings don't really trust China" which is hardly a major relevation.

The problem is that everywhere you read this someone is stating that "malicious circuits" have been found in Chinese equipment and implying that it is widespread. That's an extra-ordinary statement and requires extraordinary evidence. If it can be shown then it a) would prove that the Chinese companies were working against their customer's interests and b) would mean that all the companies buying from them would be legally required to remove all equipment made by those companies otherwise they couldn't meet basic legal data security requirements.

Mixing the two ideas together makes this whole discussion stupid.

A lie does not become truth if you just repeat it all the time. We keep hearing this all the time "Nokia was losing money" "Nokia's customers were abandoning it" "Nokia would have gone bankrupt". The truth:

• Up until Steven Elop's burning platforms memo Nokia had always been profitable for many years;
• Up until Steven Elop's burning platforms memo Nokia had continuing increasing sales.
• Up until Steven Elop's burning platforms memo Nokia had consistently increasing profits (though not every quarter)
• Nokia had a huge and growing cash mountain of several billions of Euros.

If they did nothing they could afford to quietly and silently develop an Android phone far better than the ones Samsung puts out. It was announcing the decision to move to Windows phone and the cost of that change which killed Nokia. Not their past successful products.

Samsung has been showing serious cameras that have phone functions, standard phones which have been outclassing Nokia in general reviews and real optical zoom cameras with most smartphone features. Nokia traditionally lead in phone cameras and when the original Pureview 808 came out it looked pretty neat.

Now Nokia which has contracts that leave it trapped with windows they are desperate to get some of the 808's shine back. They know that users who already used a Windows phone won't do it again so they have to look for new audiences. Aiming to sucker in camera users who they hope won't check app availability let alone how up to date the apps in the app store are is one of their better chances.

So, let me restate that as I heard it;

You believe that the security services know of widespread vulnerabilities in Chinese made equipment, which they believe were deliberately placed by the Chinese government, one of the countries they consider a serious potential enemy and against which they regularly carry out war games. You further believe that, for our own good and security, they chose to leave those vulnerabilities in the public internet which is now an integral part of their country's infrastructure where the Chinese could later exploit them at a critical moment. You believe that leaving people's computers vulnerable to mass Chinese attack is better than warning people; allowing them to take countermeasures and having some inevitable exploits by individual hackers.

That's right?