Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Google sparks online outrage with forced Google+ signups for YouTube users 3

NewtonsLaw writes: Although Google has copped flak before when they've messed around with the winning formula that is YouTube, the world's most successful and popular video sharing site, I suspect that they weren't ready for the tsunami of anger that has been unleashed against them as a result of their latest changes.

All non-passive YouTube users (ie: anyone who wants to leave or reply to comments on videos) must now create a Google+ identity and link it to their YouTube channel.

Cynics (such as myself) are seeing this as a nasty piece of *evil* blackmail on the part of Google as it attempts to boost the numbers of G+ users and the levels of activity within the G+ community.

Unfortunately, in doing this, Google seems to have completely forgotten the KISS strategy that made their search engine so distinctive and a darling of Net users everywhere. The YouTube comments system was also very simple, very clean and surprisingly effective.

Now however, users must fight their way through the acres of dross that are associated with a Google+ account and although the new system offers a few extra features, much of the essential core functionality of the previous YouTube comments system has been destroyed.

There are presently several online petitions demanding that Google reinstate the old comments system and numerous "rant videos" from upset YouTube users but perhaps the best demonstration of how poorly this forced change has gone down is the like/dislike ratio and the nature of the comments on Google's own YouTube promotional video for these changes.

Owch!

Submission + - Youtube revamps comment system

Smauler writes: Youtube are changing their comments system Whilst no one denies the current system results in obnoxious chaos some of the time, the solution seems to be a tie-in with Google+. The number one selling point is that "Comments you care about move to the top".

Comment Re:Apple made the same mistake (Score 1) 390

The Power Macintosh debuted in March 1994, running a mostly emulated operating system and applications. Until native applications were available, a Quadra was better in terms of performance. The fastest platform for running 68k Mac applications was actually an Amiga running a Macintosh emulator and a 68060 CPU upgrade. Don't discount the 68000, Apple kept selling low cost Macs (Powerbook 100 and Mac Classic) with them all the way until September 1992.

Any high end Amiga is going to be rare in the US. They were primarily sold as Video Toaster workstations here. The platform was far more popular in Europe. Things like leaking NiCad clock batteries and capacitors have taken many of them out of service however.

Comment Re:Apple made the same mistake (Score 1) 390

CPU-wise they were equal to Macs. The circa 1992 Amiga 4000 came with 25Mhz 68030 and 68040 CPUs. Most mass market Macs were shipping with 68030s with the 040 reserved for the new and expensive Quadra. Where the 4000 really lagged was graphics. The AGA chipset was easily outclassed by Apple's onboard video systems, and that is saying ALOT. Sound was still competitive, but not for very long as even PCs got "16bit" sound in the form of the PAS16 and Soundblaster 16.

Comment Re:Past it? Long past it. (Score 1) 435

Lotus Notes.... *shiver*. That client screams 1995. It still uses .INI files for its configuration the last time I set it up for a family member (they since switched to an Exchange server). The setup sheet the IT dept gave her for the client was 3 pages long and very technical.

Comment Re:What? (Score 1) 435

IHe tries to generalize it, but it seems like he's talking about outlook specifically not working with gmail. Maybe he should try not using outlook? I dunno. Maybe that's just me. I hate outlook, but my work seems to love it. I have to forward my work e-mail to a gmail account to use it on anything besides outlook.

If you have access to your Exchange server's web interface, try this.

Comment Re:iGoogle Disaster (Score 1) 435

But I stopped using a fat client a long time ago, because why the hell would you even bother? That's just my IMO of course.

Ever had to check multiple e-mail boxes? Not everyone can forward their mail to one account. Logging in and out of multiple web interfaces is a PITA, one click and all my accounts are available via IMAP.

Slashdot Top Deals

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...