If you have a varied and balanced diet and don't suffer from any condition that makes you need a reinforced dose of any particular nutrient, you don't need any dietary supplements.
So you're saying that people who don't need dietary supplements don't need dietary supplements.
Brilliant insight there.
I've yet to find a single media solution that has stood the test of time.
Clay tablets. Tested and proven for 5,000+ years and counting.
Space required for storage may be an issue, though.
No it isn't. "a complex chemical mixture of sugars, including maltose, fructose, and various oligosaccharides" is a fair description of the carbohydrates in all food, not just corn syrup. The human digestive system handles them easily and has a very obvious means of expelling partially digested materials.
What did you think poop was, after all? Evil demons being expelled from your body?
Because starvation doesn't kill people?
And people will happily stay isolated and starve to death if you ask politely without brandishing weapons and threatening to kill them if they leave isolation?
It's not war until weapons come out and people start dying.
But there'd be a massive decline in Lupus cases, because IT'S NEVER LUPUS (except that one time).
Bravo!
The only criticism I have is that Bubba Hatfield would almost certainly call them goober peas.
I read it. It's literally the same shit, different day. Nothing in it is new. It's all been posted here before.
There's a difference between defending Google (which I didn't do) and complaining about the shitty quality of what passes as "stuff that matters" on
Why does every idiotic rambling monologue filled with vague predictions of doom based on the idea that Google is too successful have to be given a place on the front page?
The FCC has a duty to invite public comment on proposed regulations. It's not their fault that a lot of people submitted idiotic comments.
The FCC regulations were put in place because there were concerns that cell phone transmissions could interfere with airplane equipment, which is a safety issue and, as you pointed out, that is their job.
It's becoming increasingly clear that cell phone transmissions are extremely unlikely to cause any interference, so the FCC is reconsidering the regulations and asked for public input. That is also their job.
What the FCC isn't responsible for is a bunch of idiots submitted stupid comments... and yet here you are blaming them for it.
The FCC regulations that banned cell phone usage on planes were based on the idea that the phones EM emissions might interfere with the operation of the airplane's equipment. That has absolutely nothing to do with "regulating behavior they find annoying" and is exactly the type of regulation that the FCC was intended to oversee.
In the time since those regulations were put in place, it's become increasingly clear that cell phones won't cause interference with the plane's equipment. The FCC is now considering revising the regulations according to the new information. This is what they should be doing and it should be encouraged.
In the process of reconsidering those regulations, they asked for input from the public. This is also what they should be doing and it should be encouraged.
It's not the FCC's fault that a bunch of people freaked out and submitted "OMG Nooooo!" comments that had absolutely nothing to do with what the FCC is actually regulating. I feel sorry for whoever has to sort through all of those comments to see if there is anything valid buried in them.
Google allows engineers to have time to pursue their own products. It doesn't require someone at the top to approve it, just a talented engineering with an interest.
Shh... you're interrupting the "OMG GOOGLE IS EVIL" circlejerk.
egrep patterns are full regular expressions; it uses a fast deterministic algorithm that sometimes needs exponential space. -- unix manuals
