So the laws made by the hundreds of different people we elect to make laws after the will of the people... don't matter. Just the opinion of 9 people who we have no say in at all as a people? I don't think so. It's true that they are there to bring justice... but "justice" is defined by the Constitution (as of primary authority) and the laws that those we elected have enacted (as long as they don't contradict the Constitution). Any other "justice" is out of place.

Sure you're not thinking of Julie Andrews instead of Kati Perry?

The one you get on-line?

Yep, God's recipe there actually calls for human shit as an ingredient for that bread.

No... what it calls for is to use it as fuel for baking over... not as an ingredient (baking with vs. mixing with). A quick googling turns up this informational page which tells you how to make your own briquettes.

This should answer that question - http://fupaper.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/klinger2.jpg

Or he could shave his head.

Your daughter is your girlfriend? To quote The Princess Bride... "Why do you keep using that word? I don't think it means what you think it means."

beget: tr.v.1. To father; sire. (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition)

...the idea of printing off your morning paper may have made sense in the science fiction of the 1950's, but HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.

I know people that still print out all of their email to read and to store in manila folders if it's something they (think they) will need for a while. If they only need to read it and then get rid of it, then they'll still print it... and then, as you indicate nobody would do, they throw it into the shredder or the recycle can.

These same people would love to have something available to automatically print out the news they want for them every morning so they wouldn't have to go out on the porch and get the newspaper... or heaven forbid, read it on a computer screen.

$10/GB over the 2 GB... which is cheaper than the current $.05 (5 cents)/MB overage fee... which is about $50/GB.

Good thing we have the government and other "unbiased" people to tell us who the experts are that can filter out all the "bad" stuff for us.

Ooops... that was my post. Not sure when or how I got logged out.

Just out of curiosity... from where do you get that particular claim? i.e. "Citation needed". Just wondering.

It's just plain stupid to not give customers the ability to view that content.

Then I guess the web sites who make ad or subscription revenue from people viewing their site better get with it and convert their content to HTML5 (like several large sites have already done) if they want the revenue from those particular eyeballs.

I'm also running 10.4 and the latest Firefox... but I'm not feeling the pain... even chatting in Facebook. I'm on an Intel Mac Mini, though... so maybe it's a G4 thing.

"Official" upgrade cost (for this OS that came with my new computer just over 2 years ago) may be around $100... but if I upgrade from 10.4 to 10.5... then I have to buy a new version of Adobe Creative Suite. That makes the "unofficial" upgrade cost somewhere around $1,900... 300% of the cost of a new Mac Mini.