I was thinking the same thing. In the Marines if we had a rifle checked out of the armory we had better have it at hand at all times. if you wanted to take a leak you slung it over your shoulder, one guy made the mistake of leaning it against a tree and of course along comes the officer. He regretted that mistake for a long time. I think if every cop/DHS knew they would lose their pay or rank or even fired for misplacing it then they would be very careful.

Well I was a UPS Driver for about 5 years and routinely got requests for packages to be rerouted to a person's work address. Have you tried that?

Most of our residential deliveries were done after our business deliveries and pickups so we would be there when somebody was home. Now and then you would have a good day and get your residentials done before pick ups, but rare. Some of my customers that I could trust would leave signed notes for me to leave in a secure location (IE left a key to the gate, a big wooden box built specifically for packages) but realize the driver pays for that package if it is left against UPS policy. Yes if you leave a signed note and the Center says its not a safe place for a driver release and you still do it and it becomes a claim then it comes out of the driver's pocket.

Have you tried to talk to your neighbor? We would do that too if asked, but try to call the 1-800 number and tell them to route to the neighbors address or your work would be the best bet.

yeah it works alright but it doesn't mean it works good. We just adopted this system and I honestly don't see a time savings, not for the doctor and not for the staff.

What I told my boss when I started to get to know the program was it's as if they said "Ok we're all done we have an EMR product, oh wait we need a lab component" and 5 minutes later they had a lab component. The typical response I get is "well it solves some problems like chasing down doctors to get them to give you a Diagnosis code" but what they aren't seeing is the paperwork I have to do later when the doctor used a code that is never covered and it was denied.

My best example of the lack of forethought in the programming is I have to type in 'yellow' and 'clear' for every urine I examine. A drop down box would save me so many keystrokes in a day, but it's electronic so it must be better.

Bottom line they bought a system that solved some problems but created whole new ones where none existed before.

/. car analogy: I complained about a car with no brakes so they gave me a car with brakes but no steering.

This is the main reason I use Adblock Plus. If the advertisements weren't so annoying then I wouldn't mind them, there are a few text ads I don't block because they aren't intrusive at all. But when I see flash based ads that yes could have been done with HTML or JavaScript then I block those immediately.

My guess is one modeled themselves after the other, but that is just my guess.

I'll have to try that out and see if it lessens Firefox's memory consumption.

but I use an add-on called Morning Coffee so that with the click of a button it loads all the tabs I want. Currently it's set at 5 pages, news, slashdot, email etc... the one add on I always install on my new machines after ad-block of course.

I think the difference is if you buy something from a company (IE: Newegg)and post online that you like it, that is your opinion, especially if there is a forum that allows negative feedback as well. If you were to create a website/blog that talked about that product and they had happened to give you the product I think you would be subject to the new restrictions.

I'm in the same boat you're in, I always joke with my friends that if they did steal my identity they would probably feel sorry for me and actually deposit money in my accounts.

They didn't have permission from the actual owners of the houses is my guess on why it was illegal.

Is this about an earlier version of Firefox? I use version 3.5 and under Options->Privacy->Location "When using the location bar suggest:" with 3 options. I picked the nothing option. What am I missing? Is this article about why they put in the option to suggest 'nothing' in version 3.5?

If you have that kind of money to waste on this 'addiction' cure wouldn't it be cheaper to just hire a therapist? I just can't see how somebody would pay that much to cure what so many generations survived without? We'll say it's a teenager forced by their parents to go here, it would still be cheaper to just take time off of work and supervise the kid for a long period of time. Maybe the parent will learn something in the process that probably got their kid 'addicted' in the first place.