Was what 'a little too close to home'?

ION engines could make a huge improvement in speed vs.Voyager probes.

https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/SMART-1/The_magic_of_ion_engines

'cisgender'. You're adorable trying to impress your friends by showing them how enlightened you are...

I don't know where you saw 12k per family per year, but that is way off. According to the EPA: "Each American uses an average of 82 gallons of water a day at home." For a family of four, that would be well over 100k gal/year.

I think you mis-read what was meant by 'closed-loop'. The water is evaporated to cool the (heated) cooling fluid that is pulling heat from the data center. The only 'closed loop' is the cooling fluid that runs from the heat exchanger to the data center.

You know they have weather reports, right? I just received a weather report not to head up to Lake Tahoe because of a giant snowstorm. Guess what? I (and many other smart people) didn't travel at that time.

I travel to 'high altitude' (7k+ ft) in my EV all the time. And I'm not dumb enough to camp in a blizzard. Why would you do that?

I go anywhere I want in my EV as well, even before the Tesla chargers being made available. Why do you think your gas vehicle is so special?

Some people have already received an adapter from Ford (I think as part of some early testing program), and there are adapters available from other companies. Headline is correct.

Using an adapter is hardly a big deal. It's pretty small and fits in the glove box. Also, there are still lots of CCS chargers that don't require an adapter.

They created a few dozen 'magic dock' charging locations that had the CCS adapter built into the charger. But I believe this was just for testing purposes. I actually have already charged my Mach-E at one of these.

The cables on the chargers are liquid cooled. It would probably be possible to use non-liquid cooled cabling for an adapter, but it would be fairly heavy and expensive. The new V4 chargers coming out are suppose to have longer cables to reach either side, so over time this should become less of an issue.

Wow, you took the time to again call me a troll, despite the fact that I clearly stated the error of your argument? And clearly stated why you 'work' (as you generously put it) was irrelevant and out of date?

You keep using the word 'troll', but I don't think you understand what that means. Someone pointing out something wrong is not a troll. You not liking what I have to say is not a troll.

I didn't deny anything. I clearly stated what PART of your argument was flawed (cost). Why would I quote things that I wasn't rebutting? That makes no sense.

Yes. I selected what was the only relevant part of your post that I was rebutting (cost). I'm glad you've finally caught on. I was afraid I was going to have to post the same quote for a fourth time.