Comment Re:Well thats a first (Score 1) 60
And this is why statutory damages are usually sought.
And this is why statutory damages are usually sought.
The obvious implication is that game vendors like screwing users in the ass when it comes to software freedom.
They're keeping the patents though.
It does have to be fair AND consistent.
The first part is substantiative due process, the second part is procedural due process.
This is also checked by the clause regarding cruel and unusual punishment.
Monsanto has a patent on camel's backs.
You don't have an unconditional right to freedom. What you do have is the right to due process before it is taken away.
If you can withdraw it, it's a privilege.
Free market means you have someone else to go to.
He was talking about copyrights you insensitive clod!
Especially given that the votes were blatantly partisan in the trial.
Simple, they do so by fiat. Since it's private property they can ban whoever the fuck they want to and they don't even need a reason.
Not anymore it isn't.
At least they didn't swipe your work for themselves and stiff you on consulting fees.
Sorry, but you already blew it by asking the first question.
You do not get a second chance to make a first impression. Studies also show that people do not change their minds.
Changing dns and copying a website are two entirely different things.
"The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel