Comment Re:Does Moore's law apply to Tsunamis? (Score 1) 197
Moore's law? No. Weibull distribution, maybe.
As in "The walls will wobble, but they won't fall down"?
Moore's law? No. Weibull distribution, maybe.
As in "The walls will wobble, but they won't fall down"?
We should launch a massive research effort, figure out the strongest possible password, and make everyone use that.
What's up with people and these retarded knee-jerk reactions ? And you got even modded insightful. This was obviously premeditated. You don't think the guy would be capable of doing the same thing if a clueless flight attendant was there while pilot is taking a leak ? A guy capable of killing himself and 150 other people like this is perfectly capable of knocking the flight attendants lights out before locking the door, and if he really intended to crash the plane... he would indeed punch her/him out first.
Second thing... there's what.. 100k flights per day for the last 10 years ? That's like 360000000 flights. For one freak occurrence you should not introduce new laws and regulations and shit. That's exactly what happened on 9/11
And finally, comment on your post title (This validates the US policy). -- The US has some of the stupidest policies ever. They are like everything else - fake.
On the surface (or on the paper) they look cool and effective, in real life they're just a shallow cover or a front for taking away your freedom and controlling your life.
I hope Europeans will actually think how they gonna deal with this instead of doing what Americans are doing. Perhaps incorporate emergency biometric scanner or something like that on the door that can override the "unlock" option ? There are dozens of better systems than
Jesus.
Digital Single Market ?!?
Tell me: why do they want to build a dating site again?
It's good to see that the bandits and bridge trolls trying desperately to maintain artificial scarcity and artificial economic friction may soon be disarmed.
Now let's just make that global.
That way *all* the factories can go to China and *all* the call centers can go to India! Yay!
The most expensive digital media market wants the prices found in the markets in regions that have totally different income brackets and standards of living?
The general idea of EU is to unify these "totally different income brackets and standards of living". There are special huge help programs for poorer member states.
Greece just called... they say they're waiting for their credit approval to go through...
Emperor Julian the Apostate! (AD 332 - AD 363)
"He is clearly Rome's second ever philosopher-ruler, after the great Marcus Aurelius. But if Marcus Aurelius was weighed down by war and plague then, Julian's greatest burden was to be that he belonged to a different age. Trained classically, learned in Greek philosophy he would have made a fine successor to Marcus Aurelius. But those days had gone, now this distant intellect seemed out of place, at odds with many of his people, and certainly with the Christian elite of society. "
http://www.roman-empire.net/co...
--nice bio by Gore Vidal, too.
...if they can deposit a layer of GaAs on top of the sacrificial layer and make circuits out of that, then why do they need the bottom wafer at all? Why not add the sacrificial layers on something less expensive and then deposit the GaAs circuit layer on top of that?
Because the chips need to be made on single-crystal material, which needs to be grown on a single crystal substrate.
This is, by the way, not particularly new in the solar cell research community. Photovoltaics researchers have been developing technologies like this for a long time-- it's called "epitaxial lift-off" or "monolithic metamorphic" in the most recent versions (with "metamorphic" indicating a change in lattice constant), but older variants were called "cleft" and "peeled film technology".
Why is google listed?
They aggregate and anonymize the data before they sell it; it's just statistical information at that point.
So the author submits a book which he doesn't believe is legally required to be submitted.
You agree to some pretty draconian rules when you get a Q clearance. One of them is submitting any future publications for review, with the understanding that they will be censored of any classified material. At issue here is whether or not information which is already public should be considered classified, just because they're too lazy to declassify information which has already been disclosed.
In this particular case, not only was the information they are upset about disclosed, a lot more information was disclosed on top of it. I remember the particular article which disclosed it, since it was in an August 1982 journal discussing how to build X-Ray lasers for SDI using exactly the technology under discussion. Instead of putting a baffle between the halves of the device and your fusion fuel at the second focus, at the second focus you put an EMP target that then uses tin and lead tubes containing wires to use the EMP to power the X-Ray lasers. I think I have a copy of it around my house (somewhere), because it's the same issue that announced energy break-even for hot fusion in Tokamak 2, which I though was a pretty cool thing.
So the info has been out there at least 32 1/2 years.
His problem is that he has prior restraint agreements with some pretty nasty teeth in them.
I bet no one ever accused you of thinking big.
You're right. He's thinking small.
Personally, I simply don't need a bunch of big plastic tchotschkies, no matter how fast I can print them.
Cheese it, it's the Feds!
Everyone hide your Beryllium-Pollonium detonators and your K-alpha reflector cavities, and act natural, for God's sake!
Also, this author probably doesn't have a security clearance, [...]
He had one at the time he helped invent the things. Yes, it's *THAT* Dr. Kenneth W. Ford who is the author we are talking about.
There's little point. Specific answers to specific questions still implies that those answers could not have been used as educational material, only for cheating.
Knowing that the correct answer to question 52b is 28 (even with the steps to copy down) really isn't that helpful for general knowledge. It's still just an answer key, it's just not a complete answer key.
No, it's a worked out long form math problem unique to the test that was passed back out the window, and an answer received. The educational material was there.
Whoever heard of an asinine, progress retarding lawsuit coming out of East Texas before?
Anyone?
I don't want to be young again, I just don't want to get any older.