Comment Re:You gotta wonder (Score 3, Insightful) 124
Well then good news. NPM isn’t a serious web application. It’s an amateur hour piece of software.
Well then good news. NPM isn’t a serious web application. It’s an amateur hour piece of software.
Sure but the USPTO can't issue patents in South Korea. And again, the lawsuit has nothing to do with patents in the first place.
Execpt no patents are involved. This is all about claims of copyright infringement.
That Hunger Games Minecraft mod you keep referencing came out like 7 months after DayZ was released.
No one is being sued over patents. Secondly, what does the USPTO have to do with South Korea? You know, the country the lawsuit is filed in.
PUBG did certainly not come up with that game concept, the DayZ mod did it in ARMA 2 back in 2013.
The guy who made the DayZ mod is the creator of PUGB. So, yes, he did come up wih the game concept used in DayZ.
ARK is not a Battle Royale game. Secondly, the creator of PUGB has other Battle Royale games that predate ARK.
Unless they think they can patent a genre this'll end badly,
They don’t think they can patent a genre. That’s why this is about copyright infringement. Not that that makes there case any less silly.
Battle Royale is more than just a deathmatch, though.
Never?
Yes it is to save keystrokes in writing useless boilerplate that the compiler can infer on its own.
and fucking JEP 286 (yay, let's make Java like JavaScript!) is a good idea,
What’s wrong with type inference and how would that make Java like Javascript? Just because both would use the keyword “var” does not make the concept the same especially as like in C# and C++11 everything would still be statically-typed unlike Javascript.
You store off program state as data not as a serialized binary object.
Considering how many bugs exist in CPUs this statement doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence. Doubly so when taking into account Meltdown and Spectre.
Bad guy intercepts encrypted email he wants to read. (MITM). He injects additional HTML data into the email (in his possession).
Except the email is still encrypted at this point. How could they inject HTML into an encrypted email?
So, yes, this does act as MITM.
Except the scenario you invented is not what this flaw is about and flaw doesn’t allow tampering with the encrypted email while in transit. The email isn’t decrypted until it reaches the email client and the email client has to be one of the buggy ones that don’t actually check the failure return.
"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.
