You should probably have your proxy choose just one path for the initial connection setup and then after some configurable number of packets start the flow cloning process to the secondary route. You want to make sure that the server has a chance to get whatever house keeping it does at connection setup time completed before you start relying on the magic of TCP to keep the server from going insane. If you mess with the connection too early you are likely going to mess something up in game's connection setup process. If you send the very first SYN packet twice there is a good chance the server will reset the connection. Then you are going to have to start adding TCP protocol logic to your proxy which is going to make it way more complex. You will need to peak at the TCP sequence numbers when deciding what to pass back to your client from the server.

UDP is a simpler protocol and therefore more complicated for you to handle. You won't have a sequence number and you will need to hash the contents of every packet coming from the server and only pass packets back to your client that you haven't seen before. And of course you will need some sort of expiration on the hashes.

Without fully implementing the TCP protocol in your proxy you can expect issues from time to time, particularly when you pause play and a reset might slip in at the TCP protocol level. But you should be able to create something that works most of the time pretty easily.

Scala seems to be kicking Clojure to the curb.

Louisiana: http://www.criminaldefenselawy... Unfortunately in New York http://www.criminaldefenselawy... the intent must be criminal.

Certainly doesn't exist in Texas.

are orders of magnitude more distracting than these device related distractions. Are we going to ban children in cars next?

The average amount of solar energy that reaches the surface of the earth is 6KWH/m^2. The earth has 510,072,000,000,000 m^2. We have only scratched the surface of what we are capable of consuming.

but it has never been clear what maps he showed the Queen of Spain. If he had a map from Marco Polo that showed a large chunk of something East of Asia that was not Spain, I think this would have been a compelling argument to go check out what was to the West of Spain.

Why isn't anyone asking why these sheriffs departments are even buying this software with their soft funds? I'll bet there is a campaign contribution that correlates with each of these sales.

Your convolution of sales and marketing indicates ignorance. True, a good marketing guy would know how to spin the differentiator. However sales guys are always incentivized by the deals they close. If they believe that the public bug database is keeping them from making money you are going to hear it from them. If the sales guys can make a convincing argument, they should be listened to. If they make more money, the company makes more money. However, they should be reminded that closing off the bug database at this point will also be used against them.

It's really not that big of a secret: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

My thoughts exactly! How can patents developed with public dollars be anything other than in the public domain?

I know for a fact that my home router shells out to IP Chains to generate the NATed ports page. It will show this page to anyone and I can't turn it off -- remote administration is OFF, but for my router that just means only 192.* addresses can login and change things like the NATed ports. It still serves up the web pages to all requestors.

Our University CS departments teach the hatred of Microsoft while the MIS departments teach the love of Microsoft. They are both wrong.

TPB will get sued in a favorable location for the plaintiff. The plaintiff will use the judgment to go after TPB bank accounts. The back accounts are much harder to hide than the servers because TPB wants to get paid for the ads it displays.

The first couple of chapters of this book explain the decision making behind the syntax which really helps. http://www.amazon.com/Windows-...