When you shutdown the system, the computer turns itself off immediately. That happens because systemD performs a hard shutdown of all the applications and services.
Well, I do not want to have data corruption just because the new "standard" according to systemD is send a kill -9 to all the applications.
Anyone non-anonymous willing to verify this?
Looks like the Apple Watch is burning people, literally
According to the manual, you're supposed to apply thermal grease and a heat pipe to your wrist before wearing the watch.
It's interesting how this habit by Microsoft has become embedded in the IT operations of many companies.
I always thought it was the IT operations of many big companies that precipitated "Patch Tuesday"
Or just use rm -i in the beginning to scout out what's actually going to get borked first, then do CTRL+C and repeat without the -i if you're feeling confident.
I wish rm had a dry-run option, like rsync does.
That makes me wonder if there might be a dry-run executable that gives read only and fake write access to a process to let you watch what it might do.
You could just as easily trash your box with a mis-typed sudo command.
Yep, and it's so easy too. You can have the exact idea of what you want to do, but a typo sneaks in anyway. The example I always tell people is when trying to type
So I tell people that whenever they plan on doing a recursive delete or recursive anything, type the target first (/Data), then return to the beginning of the command line and type the executable and other parameters. That way, it's less likely a mis-key will result in disaster.
I dislike using sudo because I type in so many commands that I get into the habit of typing my password after every one, then I'm on a system where sudo caches the credentials, and I start typing my password on the command line.
I'm not sure what you were expecting; you must have been aware that human players were moving concurrently, so why did you expect things to somehow be different in battle?
I wasn't aware of this, because when I played, there were actual turns. Not concurrent movement. I would take my turn, then I would have to wait a long time for the others to take their turns. My guess is that you're remembering a later version of Freeciv. All I know is that they changed a great turn-based game into a "My connection to the server is faster than yours" game for no good reason.
"The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel