It is tragic and idiotic that Germany is replacing perfectly good nuclear plants with lignite.

Except: that Germany is not doing that. How do you come to that retarded idea?

Lignite mining in Germany has stripped some 1500km^2 so far and is still ongoing.

Yes, but the areas are re-forrested and artificial lakes are crafted. Former strip mines are now the most beautiful areas of Germany with low population, mixed deciduous woodland and a thriving wildlife.

The land is not "uninhabitable", it is only covered by water, hence birds and fish really like it.

A significant difference imho.

Hae? What nonsense do you write? Like everyone else I have to earn my money with work ...

Point is your argument was either wrong or bad expressed. Now trying to insult me makes no sense.

Wow, an exception lie that makes no sense at all.
Is that a trick grammar rule so kids in school make more mistakes?
Who is supposed to know stuff like this except a grammar professor? That is even worth than german writing/spelling rules :)

That is not "market economics" but improvements in production ...

Actually if you would look into a dictionary, or if you where a native english speaker you knew: it is 'hang, hung, hanged'.
So your parent was right.

You know, most people here are somehow related to computers.

They only understand 0 and 1 ... sad.

The *fucking* point is: a holerith machine and a mainframe is the exact same thing.

Considering the state of the art of the time involved.

No idea why you bring up nazis, miss the point, bring up moral and insult me now.

Is it "morally" correct to insult me because I'm from germany and the nazis where from germany, too?

Or why do you insult me?

You did not get the point of my last 2 or 3 posts? Is that a reason to insult someone?

Wow ...

So Boko Haram buys their mainframes from whom? If they actually buy them, they buy them from IBM, Oracle or Fujitsu. A no brainer to figure.

Yes, but you seem to miss the point.
If the Nazis would live right now, like Boko Haman or ISS, they would buy an electric modern day mainframe and do their dirty deeds with them.

Weight lifting is one of the lowest energy burning activities you can do as "sports". Or any other kind of "gym" exercises.

Sorry ...

Well, if the americans want to call this "Ketonic Diet" when it is simply a fat burning diet, then it is no wonder that no one really understands nutrition there.

I frankly don't get what you mean with "High carb + higher carb" and "High carb + high carb + low fat" and this "High healthy fats + high healthy fats" ...

The question if you might have or might not have problems with a diet that has very high fat levels is your heart, circulation system and most of all: gall/bile.

Regarding typical american diet: it is simply to much of everything. To much sugar/carbs, to much fat AND to much proteins. And on top of that to much "no fat" diet food, "no sugar" sugar replacement stuff like diet cokes. If one mainly eats carbs, for what ever reason, then he simply should focus on not combining it with fat and trying to eat carbs with a so called "low glycemic index".

And a simple thing is to simply get rid of any kind of sweet soda, regardless if it contains sugar or artificial sweetener.

If you only eat like 2100 - 2400 kcal, depending on your "brain usage", yes. But most people who want to lose weight eat far more than that. Up to 4000 kcal.
So they first need to cut minimum 1500 kcal, then they have to "work out" to burn another 800. So you easy see: the prime focus is the cutting of intake. And: a more "healthy" diet, like eating stuff that gives the nutritions without also pulling in to much calories.

Point is: in the above (not unreasonable) example, cutting down on intake is already twice as effective as walking 12-15km (I did not check if that even burns so much kcals).

Not only a counter shockwave and the splashing as you mention.

Active armor produces an extremely high/strong electric field. And as the explosion consists of positive charged ions (does not matter what kind of "ammunition"), those get deflected.

unlike with carbs where the body works with urgency to get them out of the bloodstream now.
That is not the problem of carbs.
The problem is that insuline (high glycemic index) also triggers fat storage in(to) fat cells.
So high carb + low fat = not necessarily a negative effect.
High carb + high fat level, dependin gon the ampunt of fat, lots of fat is stored, depending on the amount of carbs, thye are converted into fat, too (but that again depends on availbale fat acids and plenty of other circumstances)

No fat at all medium carb diets have no fat storing effects ...

I understand that keto is a new buzzword in dietry, but naming a diet by the waste product it produces is a bit wiered imho :)