Only way to get it done within the backup window - 40-50 clients at a time, out of ~750. The idea is to get as close to 100% capacity for network/IO as possible, without creating a backlog. Ideally, with an unlimited budget we could just double or triple our backup destinations, but that's not an option right now.
I'm not quite sure exactly where these would be used, other than in niche systems that need large amounts of local, superfast storage.
Wireless access to a NAS? You've got it backwards _you_ are the 'niche'. Every NAS I touch is connected via 10GB, and in some cases bonded 10GB lines that aggregate to 40-50GBS. We don't want these for playing warcraft at home - we want them for work.
Example: I have NAS's as storage targets for backup daemons that receive 40-50 simultaneous backup streams from clients. Each stream can average 120-150 mBytes/sec on it's own; usually the network link is the bottleneck. Even if we pack several dozen 15k SAS drives in the bays - they can't handle that without the network buffer backlogging waiting on disk IO. Solutions like larger and faster SSD's fix these business problems for us.
BoA is a household name as a bank (and everyone knows they are rotten to the core). That household name status would make people feel like bitcoin is more "real" though, since they can goto their neighborhood BoA to cash out or buy in, etc. This would be a huge step towards de-anonymizing BTC transactions - linking real humans to all those block chain transactions. Very very bad.
Unless you are stress testing the latest and greatest PC games, very little development in my experience requires sustained high CPU frequencies. A lot of development requires little more than Notepad++ which I've got some decade old laptops that do quite well with that.
Are you talking about web development? Compiling moderate to large c/c++ projects will send the fans into non-stop high gear and turn a laptop into a hot plate. Not fun.
This model is wrong, and unfair. Google+YouTube should have a much stronger financial disincentive in place against facilitating rights violations, at least to the point where they are more proactive about it and don't simply wait for takedown notices to flow in. In other words, yes, the DMCA actually doesn't go far enough.
Why? Would you like more ads, or perhaps you would like to pay a subscription fee to access Goole+YouTube? Labor is not free. How do you propose they pay the people who will implement your suggestions?
Also, so that myself and other copyright holders can empathize with you....what copyrighted works of yours have they abused? I mean, it would be rather illogical for someone who holds 0 copyrights to post your comment. Certainly you have created something of worth(that happens to be copyrighted), and you aren't just a troll.
Came here to say this same thing. An inexpensive solar panel and handheld transistor solves this problem.
You can talk to your neighboring towns, other operators, and [in a real emergency, FCC regs out the window] anyone with a FM/AM radio turned on. If you have a appropriate antenna and power, you can talk to the other side of the planet. Why don't more people get into amateur radio? It's terribly practical.
If you don't mind getting the FCC at your doorstep, you could even transmit to the ISS and complain about your local emergency
Have you tried dealing with major transitions in a rolling release? e.g. sysvinit to systemd or upstart? Non-SELinux to SELinux? Rolling releases do not(or historically have failed) to manage this gracefully. Remember when Arch switched to systemd? Fun times....
I get it though; glad it's working for you. I love rolling releases as well [at home], and it beats the grind of a major version upgrade - hoping your
EncFS fits really nicely on dropbox. It avoids the whole every-change-causes-full-resync problem of using TrueCrypt.
Of course, that may just alert the NSA to your presence faster when you have a big glob of data they can't get at. Somewhere, someone picks up a $5 wrench and starts driving in your direction...
Clonebox is fine for home use...it's not enterprise grade though, please don't represent that it is to the droves of slashdot readers.
This is why Clonebox and similar solutions are not "enterprise grade":
1) no deduplication
2) no media lifecycle management
3) no encryption keys that you control
4) you do not control *where* the data lives
You said "enterprise grade" - reason #4 alone clobbers that assertion.
If you want to get "enterprise grade", please consider backup systems aimed at, well, *enterprises*.
Some examples for you:
1) Bacula (open source, requires an IQ above a demented bee to admin)
2) Symantec Netbackup (expensive, IQ required)
3) Commvault (expensive, minimal IQ required)
Clonebox may work *great* for you and your business - by all means keep using it! Nothing wrong with plugging it either, but please don't plug it as "enterprise grade". Somewhere some new-hire slashdotter may take that as gospel and cost him or herself their job in the future - or at the very least look like foolish in front of their peers when they parrot it.
I'm sorry for this hardship - I hope you come out on the other side O.K.
Normally (and probably) you would get a lot of flames for a post like this. What I take away from it is you are a working person like the rest of us - you aren't a big wig bitching because you don't get to have your caviar and luxury car service to take you to the golf course. It's a shame that the people that get affected by this are ordinary folks [like you]. I doubt very much that the people who made this decision will feel any impact from it - the only "trickle down" I see is the trickle down crappy deal to ordinary folks like you...it's a shame all the way around. Best of luck man, you are getting a bum deal.
This isn't a flame...but try implementing your idea in an easy mode language like Python (or any highly expressive language). Your time investment won't be large - and if it works...perfect! Then you have a proof of concept and you can refine it to death, and then port it to a compiled language.
You could host it on a visible site like github, sourceforge, or savannah to try and attract folks to help you if you are short on time as well. Time is probably the biggest barrier I have to implementing new software ideas.
Best post yet! if you want to be DIY - then put on your big boy pants and DIY. Kudos to jones_supa
If you like DenyHosts - look at fail2ban. It has all the functionality of the older DenyHosts project and more. You can ban based on more than failed ssh logins - but any type of logfile imaginable. With customized responses to X login failures per Y time units for Z service. You'll find it in the repo's for all debian/rhel based distributions.
What are you talking about? Let's take it point by point to battle the FUD.
most business software is Windows only
Large businesses using linux: Walmart, IBM, Redhat, Amazon, Rackspace, it goes on and on...their ERP software is web based running on Linux.
Linux has nothing to compare to Active Directory
You realize Active Directory is a *broken* implementation of LDAP - something that has nothing to do with Windows? The enterprise world uses IPA, Radius, and OpenLDAP. It's light years ahead of Active Directory, and actually follows RFC's(Active Directory does not).
Linux has lots of advantages, but manageability isn't one of them
There is no point and click "management" of Linux. You actually have to know what you are doing. You don't get to buy a for dummies book or take a night class to be rewarded with an "admin" job. A good example in some large(1000+ employees) enterprises I've worked for is deploying [Linux] login scripts via directory services. It allows control and lockdown of user settings and permissions in ways Active Directory cannot hope to. You mentioned Puppet also - that's a server management thing though, not a user management thing. It's good you mentioned it though...where is the Windows equivalent of that? Powershell? VBScript? Doubtful.
The world is changing man, typical users are not baby boomers anymore that have a limited computing skill set. They are intelligent, capable of learning new technology. If they aren't - they get replaced by people that *can* do those things, because those things are in the interest of the business. Stop the FUD.
Someone please fact check before publishing summaries...Ethernet "packets" don't exist. Learn your networking 101 please.
(the segment of data is a FRAME, and may contain packet data)
Education for the win... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame
Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.
