The ISPs should be legally limited to two types of traffic shaping:
1) Based purely on subscriber plan, without looking at traffic type. If you've paid for a better plan then me, your traffic gets weighted more heavily.
2) Optionally (if the subscriber requests it) they could shape based on traffic type, but only within the packets belonging to a specific subscriber.

That way, your web pages would get exactly the same priority as their video stream.

The ISPs should be legally limited to two types of traffic shaping:
1) Based purely on subscriber plan, without looking at traffic type. If you've paid for a better plan then me, your traffic gets weighted more heavily.
2) Optionally (if the subscriber requests it) they could shape based on traffic type, but only within the packets belonging to a specific subscriber.

That way, if we have equivalent plans then your torrent packets and my VoIP packets get exactly the same treatment, but my VoIP packets get priority over my torrent packets.

If you own .0000004%, and the company owes amount X and doesn't have enough money to cover it, then I see nothing wrong with you as an owner being sued for .0000004% of the outstanding debt if the company goes bankrupt.

Suppose you stepped on the brake and the car messed up and triggered the accelerator. I think the natural tendency would be to think that you had accidentally stepped on the accelerator, lift up on your foot, realize it was still accelerating, then try to brake--by which time you might have hit something.

There was an interesting article a while back about designing for robustness in vehicle ECUs. Things like putting variables at the bottom of memory so that a stack trampler would be less likely to overwrite them. Can't remember where it was now, but it was a good read.

And lets be real in our comparisons. The 35W Haswell is going to destroy your P8700.

The i5-4202Y still beats the P8700 handily in cpu benchmarks and has a max TDP of 11.5W, including memory controller and graphics.

If you start with the assumption that we need 5th gen aircraft then the F35 is the only option. But I don't think it's valid to start with that assumption--we should start with the missions that need to be fulfilled.

I think an argument could be made that it would make more sense to buy fewer F35s and buy a larger fleet of dedicated aircraft for close ground support, long-range recon, etc.

The Canadian gov't is trying to use the F35 for many different roles. It may be a fantastic air superiority fighter, but I'm not convinced it'd be better than something like an A-10 for ground support.

I don't think the current CF-18 is the Super Hornet, just a modified regular Hornet.

There have been quite a few people suggesting that the Super Hornet (or maybe the Advanced version) would be a better fit for the RCAF than the F-35.

Why are you allowing unlimited instances to be created?

From the book "Flash Boys", one of the HFT companies mentioned that they were only ever "down" one day in five years. That's not actually taking risk. That's skimming a more-or-less guaranteed tax off the top.

The main thrust of the book "Flash Boys" is that the HFTs get advance notice of your trade on one exchange, and then beat you to all the other exchanges to do the trade before you. This is not normal "first come first served", but rather a form of front-running.

I still consider it rechargeable due to the fact the the main input in remanufacturing is electricity, and that there are basically no toxic chemicals released during the remanufacturing process.

The fact that it can't be recharged *at home* doesn't change the fact that to a first approximation you put in electricity and get back a charged battery.

I lived and worked in Ottawa (Canada) for five years without owning a car. I rented a car fairly frequently on weekends, and when needed I rented a pickup truck, cargo van, cube van, etc.

It worked really well. I took the bike or bus to work and to downtown most of the time. When I needed a vehicle, I rented one. My rental costs were *far* less than it would have cost to license a vehicle and pay insurance on it, much less buying/leasing one.

Now I've got two kids and live in the prairies. Public transit sucks, so I own a smallish car. But I've still rented a van for a long trip with relatives.

Technically it's rechargeable since the only input is electricity. The fact that it's not rechargeable *at home* doesn't change that.

I've seen pictures of firemen smashing the windows of cars parked in front of fire hydrants and running the hose right through. Basic revenge, I guess.