For those out of the loop, Chelsea van Valkenberg is AKA Zoe Quinn.

You do not work for Drew.

And if you do, I've got enough Internet Archive history of FARK.com to show you out as the fucking lying scumbag you are.

Wanna dance?

" Their description is accurate enough for marketing materials"

It is still wholly inaccurate and misleading no matter how you try to say it.

*YOU* sound like one of those LED grow light manufacturers - only say enough to get attention, and not enough to explain the concept fully, thus getting idiots to buy on a misleading statement.

BTW, since you seem to not keep up with technology - we've got pulse-oximeters that don't even use light. That's OLD TECH. Catch up with the times, and maybe my patent portfolio while you're at it.

You must not have much in the way of cognitive ability yourself.

Apple does no testing. The companies that manufacture their products do the testing. Apple just slaps shit together and hopes it works.

They also have pretty much zero quality controls. Getting an entire shipment of Apple logic boards from Guadalajara FILLED WITH SAND tends to put a damper on your repair quota.

When was your term, two years ago? Try again when I did this from the early 2000s AND STILL PROVIDE REPAIR SERVICES TO THIS DAY, LET ALONE develop several of the sensors you fuckers use. (You're paying my patent portfolio!)

" It absorbs *most* of the green light, and therefore green is useful."

Actually, no, it doesnt. It absorbs HUGE TRACTS of green light *IN A SPECIFIC WAVELENGTH*

Which means if they use 540nm green LEDs whereas blood typically reflects 560 nm (proven) then they just fucked themselves.

Go to an actual school for this, please.

Easy - they claim it works by detecting wavelengths using a green diode and photodetector.

Anyone with any biology experience and light experience can tell you EVERYTHING will either absorb or reflect a certain wavelength.

Apple's saying that BLOOD ONLY REFLECTS RED is bullshit.

~photobiology research director for international companies.

Next idiot question, please.

No, you wouldn't because those failures occur ON THE LINE DURING BENCH TESTING.

It's like you don't understand how a technology company might work.

'We may have the technology, but we don't have the resources"

Spoken like a true wasteful ignorant fool.

The resource use is tied right the fuck in with the technology.

Come back when you realize the truth - not likely until you reach my level of education as a research director.

" Now aren't you glad you voted for Obama?"

I can tell you're a fucking child.

This shit's been going on since the 1920s.

Go back to school and learn history, idiot child.

the terms of the bill want to exclude from scientific research all data that is covered by patient privilege.

If you're that ignorant, you need your fucking voting privileges stripped, and on top of that any 'Scientific' degree you may hold needs to be revoked on top of that.

No, in fact, those of us that have dealt with this system before know it's the abject truth.

You must be one of those raised in the comfort of mommy's bosom children.

Instead of being a lazy fuck, how about you EDUCATE YOURSELF AS AN ADULT?

Oh, no, you're still too much of a baby, requiring things to be spoon-fed to you.

People like you make me fucking sick.

~An International Research Director that keeps your ignorant ass full of food

"mind controff.'

Given that L is nowhere near F you must be doing enough of their drugs.

"Did you know you can't wear the Apple watch if you don't have arms?"

Dunno, my ankles seem to fit this wristband just fine.

Oh, wait, too stupid to think critically.

Did you know most /. posters simply don't have common sense, despite their supposed education?