Comment Re:I don't want VR entertainment (Score 4, Funny) 74
Not jump like a fucking monkey, not wave hands in the air like a cheerleader, etc.
You're not alone; none of us want to bring our work home.
Not jump like a fucking monkey, not wave hands in the air like a cheerleader, etc.
You're not alone; none of us want to bring our work home.
Software doesn't want anything, it just does what it's told.
Your labour though, definitely DOES want to be free, so why are you getting paid for it?
To be fair, since download.com and entire CNET is actively involved in pushing malware, I wouldn't be surprised if any non-Windows downloads they might offer would try to push malware as well.
And plain wrong in many places.
There's nothing about either Node or PHP that forces you to use or not use HTML or service calls.
Same for separation of concerns (which pretty much boils down to the same thing).
For instance; both PHP and Node handle SQL equally well, i.e. they can both hook up to most databases and let them deal with SQL.
Same for JSON. Just because it kinda looks like Javascript and started out loosely based on it, doesn't mean Javascript handles it differently.
I also don't think these two were ever "old friends who went separate ways". They started out separate.
Intelligence is recognizing failure.
Wisdom is acting upon that.
In one case, the speech can still be heard or read, in the other it can't.
There's a difference between speech with consequences and censored speech.
OTOH, A typical web developer has to spend a lot of time trying to create a single HTML codebase that works across all browsers.
Restrictive syntax validation in browsers wouldn't be as big a problem if all browsers could agree on what that syntax actually does.
It's a problem of trying to solve the problem of bad standards by introducing yet another standard, which ends up not replacing any of the old standards.
The problem with XHTML is that it would never be able to stand on it's own.
Even if all web developers started creating perfect XHTML code, we'd still have a huge legacy that would require all the browser kludges XHTML was supposed to fix.
XHTML is best described as such: http://xkcd.com/927/
IPv6 doesn't suck. We're just not feeling the pain of IPv4 enough to care.
Seriously? Who writes this stuff?
Sony's script writing department.
Can't you tell they've gotten a lot better, lately?
[...]and given any pertanent information like how hackers breeched sony, what attack vectors were used, what exploits were performed (if any) and what if any IDS or firewall technology was complicit in the breech.
Likewise, the public still hasn't gotten the shopping list and blueprints required to make the bomb in the [insert random terrorist attack] attacks.
I do agree the "North Korea did it" storyline seems a bit off.
Kitkat is killing Lollipop uptake the same way cars are killing rocket-car uptake.
There is no Lollipop upgrade available for any of my devices yet.
Apart from Apple fanboys, I don't think anybody is stupid enough to buy a new device just to get a software upgrade.
Based on the similarity in names, these porn movies are quite obviously infringing on the copyright of these open source projects.
How about sending DMCA requests to get these porn movies banned from Google?
Two can play this game!
(as a side note; cue bad joke replies in 3.. 2.. 1..)
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.
