"Plain vanilla distri" for debian or redhat?
Same would be true for any other application, including GIMP.
FWIW, I prefer Photoshop. I can just about manage to get things done in GIMP, but it's not a pleasure; the UI is an utter mess. Not talking about it being different from PS, but about it being an utter mess all on it's own merits.
And I would love for old Paint Shop Pro to return instead of the crappy instagram-like PSP it's degraded into.
Seriously; why did they Corel mangle PSP so badly?
Old PSP was truely "Cheap Photoshop without the color management stuff few people need and even less people know how to use".
Prior to Windows 8, what exactly where people using to start applications if they were not using the start menu?
Or did they just notice the start menu was being used less often because people were keeping applications open?
Huge and --apparently-- very, very flacid.
Exactly. Just because you don't use any typical consumer application doesn't mean you're not a user with needs that may not (yet) be fulfilled by the applications you do use.
If you like the user-to-guru-to-contributer path, but you're not really using any application... think again; IDE's are applications too.
Yup. a ghetto of money-printing mainframes, application servers, supercomputers and cheap sub-par IT labor services.
What the poster wants doesn't sound like a Wiki at all.
Unless he wants ALL other random people to add, change and update information, he would be better off using any random CMS.
Wiki's trade content creation features for maintenance/editing features.
Content in a Wiki is easy to change and hard to make look perfect.
If you want perfect looking content and don't need the ability for anybody to change content in a few seconds, don't use a Wiki.
They are indeed free to do so just like you and me.
But it's not part of their job and they have no more legal standing to do so than you or I.
So in proposing laws they are NOT acting as a territorial police force of sworn constables, they are in fact acting as a corporate lobbying group.
City of London Police when enforcing laws = territorial police force of sworn constables.
City of London Police when proposing laws = corporate lobbying group.
It's important to distinguish these two roles and their difference.
As a territorial police force of sworn constables, are they responsible for proposing laws?
Because that's what they're doing here.
In the Netherlands, we have such a system (called "iDeal").
As far as I know, atleast Germany and a few scandinavian countries have similar systems.
I dare bet a lot of countries have such systems as well.
"Web-scale" is "big enough to hold a Wordpress database"?
"I like and believe very much that we should have to obtain a warrant from an independent judge to be able to take the contents,"
The citizens would like and believe that very much too
But that isn't really what's happening, now is it?
Yeah, why aren't they taking on all the poor people buying vacant lots and building houses with pools on them?
Wordprocessors are used by lazy typists and compilers are used by lazy programmers.