Oh man I loved that game. Force choking people into pits, kicking people off ledges, pushing/pulling jumping people to their death, what a blast!

Or the defense could just vandalize the Wikipedia page and then ream the cop's "expert Wikipedia testimony".

Michael Jackson knocked on the gates of heaven, and St. Peter told him to "Beat It".

Switzerland is also very xenophobic, don't go there if you're black. By the way how would they react to a red haired person with white skin?

Finland has the best privacy laws in the world, and Finns enjoy a lot of rights, such as "right to roam". Finland also had women's suffrage in 1906, much earlier than most countries. Finland is also a highly technological nation, which since you post on slashdot, is probably a plus. Most of the people there will speak english to some degree, which should make communicating a little easier.

Finland, however has disadvantages such as, a very difficult native language, immigrating will be tougher than other nations, cold weather, and possible invasion from Russia. If you like Finland, but can't handle the language, you could try a different Scandinavian country, as they all share the same basic values.

You should find this link helpful, it has an immigration section. http://www.finlandforum.org/index.php

Well to me the difference is that it isn't for an individual's personal use. I personally draw a distinction between piracy for personal use, and piracy for business use, and this is closer to the latter. It's different when you are profiting from piracy.

My university has a ban on using wireless routers in dorms. What are some plausible reasons for doing that? They already require anyone who wants internet access to run antivirus and the Bradford Persistent Agent. This might also be true for intranet access. The university provides wireless in some areas, but not in any dorms.

Some questions. Why is that a fallacy? Do wars help the economy? If so, why does this broken window fallacy not apply to wars?

Why is this modded insightful? The government should have the right to terminate any company for what their CEO says. That is a terrible idea. Not only is it a bad idea in principle, as it would surely be abused, it also would harm a lot of innocent people like employees and stockholders. There's no way, even by your standard of morality that every person who worked for Microsoft, or owned stock are immoral.

I attend a school that does a few unethical things, not all of them directly related to rankings. For starters they claim to only have only professors with Ph.D's, yet my CS professor only had a Masters. They also reported that only 2% of students transfer out of Furman. While that is technically true, they failed to mention that their trimester system makes transferring very difficult. After attending, and talking to many people, it seems that at least 25% would have transferred if had been easier to.

The other gripe I have is that they tell everyone "2 years of GERs to figure out what you want to do, then major in anything you want". That is unfortunately a straight up lie. I talked to a music professor and he said that to be a music major a person would have had to declare freshman year, and would have had to play since late middleschool. He said it would be completely impossible for any sophmore to get a music degree. Also, other majors like CS, and Chemistry are either very linear, or only offer a few courses each term, so it takes at least 3 years to complete the major.

How do you view porn on a DS? I have a friend who wants to know how...

Which fund is this?

This will be controversial but hear me through. Assuming he doesn't have any medical conditions that make it dangerous for him to take LSD, get him some. The basic idea behind this is the psychedilic helps him hit rock bottom, so he wants to change his life. It worked pretty well for treating alcoholism before LSD was banned.

Handbook for the Therapeutic Use of LSD-25