Sorry, but nutters will be nutters, and the nutter Left loves to use that term. You have apparently never listed to the fringe Left media. Mike Malloy, among others, loves that term, and it isn't being used sarcastically.
.... the Obama administration doesn't seem to have much interest in extraditing him (and executing him (as the conspiracy theory goes)). A future Hillary Clinton administration, on the other hand,
Why Clinton Cash Has Bi-Partisan And National Importance
Since 2001, the Clinton Foundation has amassed a staggering $2 billion, mostly in chunks from globally powerful individuals, multinational companies and foreign countries.
There were articles of impeachment of President Nixon moving in the House, the first was voted out of committee. The only reason Nixon wasn't impeached was because he resigned.
Judiciary Committee Approves Article to Impeach President Nixon, 27 to 11
In your case it works both ways.
We seem to be safe for now, the vendor of the IP is only including visual recognition, not audio.
The vendor of this IP claims their IP is far more power efficient. That could be important for many applications, or scalability.
Delivers 1000 GOPS/W with 5x better power efficiency than GPUs
They're offering high perfomance, low power, low cost IP cores that can be combined with other IP. This will make it easier and cheaper to integrate that functionality into other devices.
News release: Synopsys Launches High-Performance Embedded Vision Processor IP
Description page w/ link to datasheet: High-Performance Vision Processors Optimized for Object Detection
Interesting nugget: Delivers 1000 GOPS/W with 5x better power efficiency than GPUs
Your post has nothing to do with the thread and post you responded to. It is a non sequitor, an injection of a political attack against conservatives into the discussion. To correct you, "Bob" isn't making a point, he's making an argument, and a specious one at that. His writings in essense are a polemic which is riddled with errors or distortions from what I've seen. Oh, and what a surprise, it was written during the height of BDS - Bush Derangement Syndrom, of which he seems to be a carrier.
So if we are recommending literature that might provide some illumination on the qestion of authoritarians, there is a book that is far more useful and factual than Bob's book. You can find a review here and the book here.
How about we disregard what EVERYONE thinks and go by what the law says. How's that 4th amendment go again?
Thanks, you've just demonstrated my point, pretty much exactly. Can we get some chants for Articles II and III? I'm sure that will be far less popular, but highly relevant.
You can chant "4th Amendment" till you're blue in the face, as is common here, but if the issue at hand isn't covered by the 4th Amendment then the 4th Amendment is irrelevant. Even if the 4th Amendment does apply, its application may not be what you expected.
The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution is simply law, not a magic talisman able to repel all things people here find unpleasant.
Considering that our country was founded on the idea of consent of the governed [wikipedia.org], I'd say that "what the mob believes" regarding what liberty requires is exactly where that line falls.
If it wasn't for that pesky Constitution and the actual body of law from it.
I think if you examine the US Constitution for the acceptable means to alter its contents that street protests and tirades on Slashdot are not among them. The law is what it is until properly changed.
You can't pardon and release those that aren't imprisoned. How and why were they imprisoned, and by whom? The government is responsible for more than one thing, and is granted the power to do it. Ignoring that fact does not make it go away.
I disagree. They are not tasked with keeping us safe; they are tasked with safeguarding our liberties.
I guess you aren't a big believer in the US Constitution then. There seem to be things like the army, navy, militia, and common defense mentioned. I also see that the President is given the power to grant Pardons. Might some people be in jail for breach of peace, reducing the "safety" of others? You might think so.
Preamble to the United States Constitution
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Clause 1: Command of military; Opinions of cabinet secretaries; Pardons
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Your oversight is understandable. People here are all about Amendments 1, 2, 4, and 5. They don't really care much about any other part of the Constitution, and that inattention shows.
The game of life is a game of boomerangs. Our thoughts, deeds and words return to us sooner or later with astounding accuracy.
