The ONLY logical conclusion for your premise is that we should rip all the hard earned equity accumulated by people upon their death and give it to the state. What makes you think that is any better than how it currently is? What makes you think wealth is the only thing you inherit that gives you advantages?
I made a claim about the definition of Libertarianism. How you get from that to all these other things is a special form of logic that eludes me.
Unfair Advantage does not equate to opportunity.
I never claimed that either.
Tall people have an unfair advantage when playing basketball, however, all people have equal opportunity, hence all the under 6' players that succeed in basketball, and people like me (6'5") can't shoot for shit.
People are born with all sorts of advantages and disadvantages, it is wholly unfair for arbitrary rules designed to "level the playing field", which equate (IMHO) to the cure being worse than the disease.
we are not talking about fairness. And we are not talking about advantages people are born with. We are talking about advantages that society GIVES THEM.
Property is a RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLE. It is ARTIFICIAL. You only inherit because everybody concedes that you inherit. If everybody claims that the state inherits, then the state inherits. If everyone claims that the king inherits, then that is what happens. It has to do with social relationships.
Abolishing private inheritence may do little to equal the playing field in terms of innate advantages but that is still more equal than allowing it.
Take for instance the biggest industry that plays upon the advantages of inheritance (not necessarily monetary), Hollywood. It is a bastion of Liberal / Socialism group think.
It's not, but I don't care about Hollywood. We are talking Libertarian core values.