Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - NSA Phone Program Likely Unconstitutional, Federal Judge Rules (huffingtonpost.com) 3

schwit1 writes: A federal judge ruled Monday that the National Security Agency's phone surveillance program is likely unconstitutional, Politico reports.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon said that the agency's controversial program, first unveiled by former government contractor Edward Snowden earlier this year, appears to violate the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which states that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated."

“I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval,” Leon wrote in the ruling.

The federal ruling came down after activist Larry Klayman filed a lawsuit in June over the program. The suit claimed that the NSA's surveillance “violates the U.S. Constitution and also federal laws, including, but not limited to, the outrageous breach of privacy, freedom of speech, freedom of association, and the due process rights of American citizens."

Comment Re:Rule #1 (Score 5, Informative) 894

I think you're the one to misread the constitution:

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

This was clarified in District of Columbia v. Heller:

"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

Comment Re:This is mostly outdated service (Score 5, Informative) 280

Some of us like to create test labs that will outlast the 30-180 day expiration date associated with MS evaluation periods (such as with SQL Server or BizTalk). An MSDN susbscription is more expensive than TechNet by the order of several magnitude.

I'm not sure what's going on with MS these days. They release a monstrosity of a desktop OS (Win8), a sub-par hermaphrodite laptop/tablet to go with it (Surface), and they are now giving their loyal developers the finger.

Comment Re:Jupiter Tape? (Score 1) 621

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Fuchs#Second_World_War It wasn't actually that long. Although the general public didn't find out until after the fact, the information had already been leaked to several world governments. When Truman first hinted to Stalin that such a weapon was being developed, Stalin already knew about it and wasn't at all surprised.

Comment Re:It's a complete game changer (Score 2) 121

I'm a Type 1 who's been wearing a pump for the past 6 years. I also have the relatively new real-time glucose monitoring attachment.

I haven't read through the fine details of the article, but if the nanoparticles are somehow able to determine when to release insulin without intervention, that would be a definite benefit over the current pump technology. As it stands right now, the real-time monitoring only tells you that your blood-sugar levels are high, and requires manual intervention to make corrections. The sensors are also wildly inaccurate, and require that the user still check their blood-sugar on a regular basis for calibration. I quit using the sensors for that reason (since I still end up checking my blood sugar 6-10 times daily anyways, there's no point).

FWIW, the pump is a huge improvement over old-school syringe injections. Having insulin delivered in small quantities throughout the day has improved my blood-sugar levels considerably. Using a pump has also made the entire process much more convenient; I don't need to cary syringes and insulin bottles with me when I go out to eat at a restaurant, and I'm less worried about blood sugar spikes while I'm sleeping.

Comment Re:Defense (Score 1) 528

While I agree with you on principle, you're post is wrong on quite a few levels. A Class 3 permit or NFA tax stamp is required for purchasing a fully-automatic weapon. Extensive background checks are required, some states have restrictions of the types of weapons, and your local sheriff has to approve it. The entire process usually takes about 6 months (my Dad has purchased two NFA weapons before). A quick Wikipedia search states this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act Please, think about what you're saying before spouting off this type of stuff. It's misinformation like this that's causing people to freak out over the current gun policies.

Slashdot Top Deals

Modeling paged and segmented memories is tricky business. -- P.J. Denning

Working...