Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:people are going to be saying (Score 1) 703

by Major Blud (#49346403) Attached to: Germanwings Plane Crash Was No Accident

"well-regulated = well-trained"

I know what you're aiming for here, but that doesn't guarantee any more level of safety against incidents like this from happening. The pilot in this situation was well-trained, and I'm sure went through a psych-eval during his career. Nidal Malik Hasan was also well-trained and vetted, and a member of the military (the people you WANT to have guns), and that didn't stop what happened at Fort Hood.

Comment: Re:Straight from Dubya, that's where: (Score 1) 228

by Major Blud (#49338317) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

"Initially, a recommended 20% of the PEPFAR budget was to be spent on prevention, with the remaining 80% going to care and treatment, laboratory support, antiretroviral drugs, TB/HIV services, support for orphans and vulnerable children (OVC), infrastructure, training, and other related services. Of the 20% spent on prevention, one third, or 6.7% of the total, was to be spent on abstinence-until-marriage programs in fiscal years 2006 through 2008, a controversial requirement "

So yes, some of it was devoted to abstinence-only programs (which are proven not to work), but:

"To slow the spread of the epidemic, PEPFAR supports a variety of prevention programs: the ABC approach (Abstain, Be faithful, and correct and consistent use of Condoms); prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) interventions; and programs focusing on blood safety, injection safety, secondary prevention ("prevention with positives"), counseling and education."

I know Wikipedia isn't the gospel truth, but somehow I doubt mcclatchydc.com is either. Feel free to update Wikipedia with the claim that the groups were "prohibited from spending any of it on family planning services or counseling programs".

Comment: Re:Countries without nuclear weapons get invaded (Score 2) 228

by Major Blud (#49338273) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

Since it's paywalled, I guess we'll never know.

The program mentioned in the article (PEPFAR) did devote money to programs that promoted abstinence, which is definitely somewhat misguided, but still spent two-thirds of its funding on programs which supported the use of condoms. Wikipedia makes no mention of an "insistence" or requirement that the aid money be devoted to abstinence-only methods.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

Comment: Re:Countries without nuclear weapons get invaded (Score 1) 228

by Major Blud (#49337639) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

"besides insisting foreign aid be tied to no contraception?"

Where on Earth is this official U.S. government policy? I know there are a lot of crackpots in the U.S., some of them in government even, but you'll be hard pressed to find any official documentation to verify this.

And 20 years is too long ago? What about 10 years? 4 months?

Comment: Re:Countries without nuclear weapons get invaded (Score 4, Insightful) 228

by Major Blud (#49337543) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

"Japan wanted the oil in the Philippines"

uh, wut? Japan wanted the Philippines to protect their southern flank and for agricultural purposes....they wanted Indonesia for oil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

But you are correct.....Afgahnistan does not have oil, and the U.S. gets very little of its overall oil from Iraq.

http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_b...
http://news.mongabay.com/2007/...

Comment: Re:How fucking tasteless (Score 1) 338

by Major Blud (#49334635) Attached to: Feds Attempt To Censor Parts of a New Book About the Hydrogen Bomb

It seems ironic that he would find the wiping out of another 100,000 people by atom bomb too horrible when the conventional bombing of Tokyo killed that many during Operation Meetinghouse on March 9-10 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

People sometimes get pictures of the conventional Tokyo bombings confused with those of Hiroshima.

It is the quality rather than the quantity that matters. - Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 B.C. - A.D. 65)

Working...