No, you can not say it no longer applies. You can say the laws need changed, you can say the internet is different. But you cannot say it no longer applies without an act of congress making it so. The EPA cannot just say the times are different so now we are going to rehulate chewing gum while incard. The prosecutor cannot just say times are different so the laws against murdering people no longer apply. The prosecutor cannot just say times are different so the speeding fines no longer apply and its 6 months in jail instead.

He likely wouldn't have internet af all. These rules allow service providers to flood the profitable markets and ignore the unprofitable ones. Expect rate increases in those unprofitable markets like low income areas and places where yhe population density isn't high.

Cpmcast will win their lawsuite too.

The FCC back in 1998 already determined with well thought out reasoning that congress never intended the internet to be regulated under title 2 and stated so clearly with lots of supporting evidence that its intent was as an information service. They even mention their computers II working paper that the 1998 law was modeled after. No law concerning this has changed since either.

You can find this report in ghe federal register as the bi anual report to congress on accessability or something like that. It is the only FCC report to congress in march or may of 1988. The internet stuff is around page 28 or so. I am posting from a phone so your google finger will have to look it up.

Using the force of the United States government vie senate commity is the McCarthy connection. You and I can debate or ignore based on funding sources all day long. We are not the government.

To make sure they stay empty and keep them that way.

Actually, skme of this is more humanitarian than authoritarian. A lot of these places in the desert will ohtfight kill yoh before you can cross it if you are not prepared.

Years ago they were talking about teathering balloons and blimps to reach the same objective. I guess drones are much cooler.

Correction. Americans have no interest in those jobs at the wages being offered. Of course the wages will never rise when the employer can exploit illegal aliens at lower and sometimes even illegal wages.

But wait you think, those are minimum wage jobs. Well, nothing forces them fo pay only minimum wage. Should a real and legal market exist, they would likely be paying above minimim wage and would not be minim wage jobs.

I'm wondering. If the nerve transplant alllows use of the bionic hand, why wouldn't it allow use of the nerve damaged hand?

It probably would be safer with a fake hand as feeling probably would remain gone so burns and other damaging injutirs could go undetected wherd its not so mucb a health concern with tbe bionic hand. I dunno, maybe there is something moe technical or maybe it a "because i can" thing.

All of fed ex that ships anything is required to have an ICC number and therefore a common carrier unless they registered as not for hire and only transport their own goods to their own points of market.

Probably reliability and accuracy. Its likely easier to either alter tracable identifyers, destroy the weapon, or sell it tp some thug to take the heat and buy/steal new guns than to master reliability and accuracy and put it into production undetected.

The tea party protests started before the 2008 election even happened.

Remember joe the plumber?

Perhaps you or where ever you get your news from ignored it until later.

Thats why i only post from stolen tablets on the free WIFI at various fast food places like McDonalds using VPN accounts purchased with stolen credit cards.

Oh, and i also wear a tin foil hat- not to be confused wiyh the cheap aluminum foil hats.

it is the free market and you better suck it up

You do not have to suck it up or even like it. The idea behind a free market is that you can stay away from what you do not like and go to what you do like.

Of course if it's the only choice, it isn't a free market is it?

lol.. Not really. It would be no different then them buying US dollars, exiting the Eurozone, creating a crap currency, then converting back into their crap currency. It needs nothing hard at all. Any paper or fiat currency will work.

Greece will not have to export anything, all they will have to do is find someone willing to sell. That's where a bit coin operation would work. They purchase bitcoins from whoever sells, when they exchange them back out, it's the current exchange rates. Whoever sells them can purchase hard assets or take the loss or do whatever their scheme allows.

Greece could purchase gold and do the same. Using a crypto currency only allows that to happen without having to purchase the asset themselves.

I appreciate the attemp to bring light to something you see as a wrong in society but no one seems to be disputing the fact that we are talking about the commision of a violent crime ( robery even if violence wasn't involved) and legal penalties where Ms. Richards' situation came about (if your version is accurate) from social expectation/normalities, panties getting bunched up and the reactions to it. I do think there is a distinct difference here. In theory at least, with the criminal version there is an appearance of fairness.