The question then becomes; is it bad if Mozilla were gone?
What is the added value of Mozilla and their products right now?

Inhale, exhale, inhale, exhale. Keep repeating! Remember, your mind does not control you.

Being aware of things means you are operating on a conscious level. If you're "in the zone", you are operating on a subconscious level. All your conscious thoughts are directed towards a singular task. Spotting whether you're "in the zone" is not part of that singular task, therefore you will not notice it until you come back out of it. If you are noticing it, part of your brain must still not be focused on the singular task, therefore you are not completely "in the zone".

The very act of becoming aware of being "in the zone" triggers your brain into no longer being "in the zone".

Definitely not option B; beta.slashdot.org redirects to the normal site, so they've given up on beta.
I think they were just trying to improve the normal slashdot.org site, the way a psychopath might try to improve his own face.

Surely I can't be the only one who finds this kind of "easy listening muzak" incredibly irritating. It sounds annoyingly bland and emotionless to me.
Music tastes are subjective and change with the mood. There is no singular type music that'll work for more than a small fraction of all programmers.

If you're aware that you're "in the zone", you're not.

The entire new testament pretty much selectively foreshadows the ending too.
Jesus was loser-edited.

It's already implemented.
The powers that be have chosen "No one is cyber-secure" for you.

This may present another problem.
If the insurers rate projects differently and offer different insurance rates for each project, this insurance rate would effectively become an endorsement of sorts.
Also, I don't think there's anything preventing individual kickstarter campaigns to offer such an insurance if they want.

One the other hand, this will be the end of all religious websites.
After all, I think we can all agree religion isn't factual, right. Right?

Yes, I think we can all agree the Un-Beta looks like shit.
It's quite... fascinating how a site for nerds can't seem to get the most basic CSS1 right.

Facebook has just turned 11 years old a few weeks ago.
Most people who joined facebook in their teens are no longer be teens.
How can it still be called a "teen phenomenon"?

If you seriously don't know what the moderation system of Facebook looks like, you don't get out much.
It's demonstrated on pretty much every website, on TV and radio commercials and shows. Even paper media will tell you how it works.

Go back to your hipster coffeebar and don't come out until you've grown your own opinions.

Atleast getting the delete file error is quick.

I continue to be amazed by the slowness of some other common file operations,
1. Select a lot of files and directories.
2. Drag them to another folder to start copying.
3. Wait a few seconds and cancel.
4. Wait 15 minutes while a window shows "Cancelling...", during which you can't really do anything.

Why does it take so long to cancel file copying? It has to delete a single (partial) file at most.

Hey! I've had that signature way before those books were a mere itch in their authors' belt-beaten bunghole.

Damn him for putting his money where his mouth is!

Most people simply don't have the technical skills to maintain a website, even if it is a modern CMS.
Wordpress.com has an anti-porn clause. So do pretty much all hosting providers. Those that do allow porn (usually on dedicated accounts) charge a lot more to do so.