Google responded to a query from a dutch newsite regarding this issue.

Source: http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/107318/google-verbant-belgische-kranten--uitgevers-woest.html

Relevant quote, translated:
``We regret having taken this action, and are open for future cooperation with members of Copiepresse. Would we keep the material in our index, we risk fines up to 25,000 euro per incident. We would be pleased to include Copiepresse in our index if they declare they want to be included on Google Search and refrain from potentional charges``, Google declares to Webwereld.

Original response in dutch:
``"Het spijt ons dat we dit moeten doen, en we staan open voor samenwerking met leden van Copiepresse in de toekomst. Zouden we het materiaal in de index houden, dan riskeren we boetes tot 25.000 euro per inbreuk. We nemen Copiepresse graag weer op in de index als ze aangeven op Google Search te willen verschijnen en afzien van potentiële boetes", verklaart Google tegenover Webwereld.``

I agree with any line you say, but like to comment on it please. Yes, i have considered asking meds for my addiction control. However, might (rightful?) fear is i'll just get addicted to the meds as well. Also, caffeine addiction is really in no comparison to other drugs. I quit caffeine without problems once. Heck, in the past i quit some of those other earth- and cloud colored drugs.

Yet, the situation may not be as simple as you suggest. 'Grab the problem by its root' sounds to me pretty much as 'never got born'. Yes, i also have borderline-issues, dont care how you classify them ppl use terms like 'adhd' and 'autism' so often these days it almost got meaningless, in my youth i -apparently- was considered 'a bit odd but still within normal deviation'.. Over-diagnosis and over-treatment might actually be the worse choice in lots of cases; especially if you consider the hard truth of liquor and tabacco (and to a lesser degree marihuana) being generally entirely socially accepted.

The line between 'social, responsable use' and 'abuse' is in fact a large grey zone, and all i could suggest is encourage yourself by some self discipline to try stay on the safer side of that zone. Drink less, smoke only little, internet with care. No psychoanalyst or (over)diagnoses needed here some common sense could help too... Cause in terms of 'adhd' 'bipolar','schizo','autist','asperger' about 80% of /. probably fits such indication yet i doubt they all are heavy smokers or drinkers.

It's quite obvious your addiction is the major problem. In your post you even already mention your escapes : 'can internet at work' (and on smartphone and at friends and offline at home). Others here tell you, and other others even also say internet can no longer be socially avoided. It's like telephone has been for 100 years, TV for 50 etc.

Now, my advise from here would be addiction control. Yes, the AA will tell alcoholics to entirely quit. Such hardly ever works. Any cigarette smoker will tell you the same. Smoke 1 cigarette after 5 years of quitting, and you'r hooked up again. Also, again, as others point out: internet is an essential part of modern society, and as such even its addiction needs special treatment.

My [patent pending] proposal for most addicts is: Addiction control. Quit the idea of quitting altogether, as a regular thc, ethanol and nicotine user i can guarantuee you such idea is prone to fail. It comes down to some self-discipline and yes, technology makes it easy. It can help you, morally.

Chances are you have a modern router. Find 'parental settings' or something, and set a time clock. Of course, you can overrule it (and from an addictive point of view i even say: feel free so, to do so, at any time you wish). But the netto effect is: If you do nothing (have this self discipline) your internet will be on between 19:00 and 20:00, enough to check your email after cooking, and shuts down after. In the morning dito, have a 30 minute timeframe to fetch that mail or facebook.

On older routers, just plug in such simple 24h wall-clock.

Also, leave pc on, purposely, to rediscover the stuff we could do with computers for 30+ years (about since home computer was invented, around 80's) without ever using internet. Yes, the good old cassette tapes etc, maybe you have nostalgia to that times? [personally, nostalgia, yes. longing back to it, no. how convenient 'just clicking download' is these days]. Going off-topic here, cause my key point was: it's about addiction control:

Make appointments with yourself. Try to keep to them. Do NOT feel guilty when you don't keep to them, just review the appointments you made with yourself.

gl from a junkie.

Most likely, a system like this is so inefficient in terms of network usage vs potentional computational power plus added administrative overhead, that it would only be wasted bandwidth and electricity and netto only harmful on a macro scale.

Better have the wikipedia servers, and other datacenters, run some boinc when idling. But they won't do that cause it's directly translated to the electricity bill. Network and cpu power are cheap, but still not free, and cpu's make up a large part of that power bill especially when used.

I do however like the general idea though, of 'giving some useful cpu time back' as thanks for using a free service. For example, as alternative for the now-common advertise system. As long if it could be done efficient, i see no objection at all, but i'm afraid it can't, at least not on a 'per-web-request' microscale.

And i've still no clue what would be the most close answer. As numerous people said above, there's none, and not even 1 that comes close enough to be obvious.

Functional names doesn't really match as those names are not describing anything function.

'People' in the first 2 options make it impossible to use any other self-name.

'I don't name my servers' suggest the servers do it themselve or use install defaults, yet, might be the best option as _others_ have named those objects or thing i have named them after already.

Pets, i wish... maybe 'pet projects' or 'pet interests' might suit, but pets.. besides, i have more boxes to name than pets to name them after so i never considered pets as option.

I'm afraid i have to let this poll expire and never get that 'answer 25 polls in a row' achievement...