Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Already done (Score 1) 242

Thunderbolt cables have part of the interface electronics physically in the connector body - that's why they cost so much. It also means you can swap a thunderbolt copper cable for a thunderbolt fiber cable without having to worry about the equipment at the ends having an exotic fiber interface.

I don't know if you can even get a thunderbolt fiber cable yet. They don't go any faster than copper, but they do go longer, which could be handy in a few niche applications. I'm thinking supercomputer and cluster interconnects. Could be cheaper than infiniband, and lower latency than ten-gig ethernet.

Forgetting about the myriad factors why thunderbolt is not a replacement for infiniband (like fact that QDR inifinaband on a 12X link is already an order of magnitude faster than thunderbolt, or that it's switched, which thunderbolt isn't) intel would definitely have to drop the graphics tie in to see even a remote viability of thunderbolt for *any* reason on my completely headless servers.

Comment Re:OT of course, but not the answer either (Score 1) 567

All of what you wrote, I agree with. In addition, I am a left-leaning person (and live in what Americans would deem a "socialist" country).

But none of what you wrote means that bullies should be given free rein and inflict childhood trauma onto other kids. Hence, I'll teach my son to defend himself, and if push comes to shove, a bully will have a finger or nose broken. That may actually be good for the bully in the long run, too, as the social services will be spurred to intervene (if they haven't already).

So yes, let social services and other institutions take care of the root cause of the bully's asocial behavior. In the meantime, my son will stay safe by engaging in self-defense.

Thoroughly agree, I never said kids that are bullied shouldn't defend themselves, I said that not all of them *can*. I also advocated that the *societal* approach to the problem is not the direct, unthinking violence of the OP. When I have kids they'll get self defense classes, absolutely

Comment Re:curl up and die. (Score 1) 567

Bullying often stems from problems, many of them at home. Abusive parents, neglectful parents, absent parents, actual mental issues, economic problems, familial stress, physical injuries, drug and alcohol issues and many more things all can play a part.

As someone who was repeatedly attacked and harassed and threatened - I see nothing has changed. You fucking teachers and administrators still feel perfectly justified telling a victim of violence, a child no less, that they must endure it for the sake of the person that just attacked them.

Do you have ANY idea how that makes you feel?

What in my post gave you any impression that A)I wasn't bullied (as I said, I would have been with the OP at 13, there's a reason for that...) or B)That I feel the victim should just endure it? IWhat I said was that *systemic* traumatic attacks on bullies (Neutering? Really?) are not the answer. Everyone should be able to defend themselves (it's how *I* stopped being bullied, a punch to the nose does wonders on an individual level in terms of making yourself less of an easy target), but the systemic answer can't be "take 'em out back and beat them when they bully" because the causes are not simple and such a solution would likely make things worse. I will also point out that in the same way abusive parents beget abusive parents, your very rage, and that of the OP, is putting you in the position of advocating similar violence to what you suffered. Look beyond it, you'll feel better, I promise.

Comment OT of course, but not the answer either (Score 3, Insightful) 567

F. U.

Tell it to the little kid that was me 35 years ago. Smartest kid in the class and chubby. It started in first grade when I whizzed through vocab. Scaled up to ostracism, getting chased, being beaten. Got jumped by guys with knives but luckily ran away.

The only thing that got people's attention was studying karate and breaking a big 6th grader's nose. Aside from that a glacier rock was my best friend at lunch hour. Sure I had some friends, other geeks. But it only really stopped after I got out of the public school system and commuted an hour away to a preppy private high school.

If you want to know why America sucks at least one reason is because of the utter wasteland of stupidity that is the public school and community of people going to it for 90% of the people, and the system refusing to beat down bullies while they're young. Law of the jungle? Gandhi? Fuck that. I still have trauma from when I was that little kid. Maybe you just didn't get bullied enough. Tell it to kids (not me thankfully) who have gotten rolled up in gym mats, suffocated and died.

I bet a huge proportion of slashdotters have been bullied like me. Fixing (neutering) bullies and rewarding fair play would do a lot towards fixing (neutering) our military-industrial complex and maybe even our money politics.

Like most things it's not that simple. At 13 I would've agreed with your final conclusion. Then I grew up and learned the world is more complicated than that. I've also worked with and taught HS kids, where I learned things get even more complicated when you know even more of the backstory. Bullying often stems from problems, many of them at home. Abusive parents, neglectful parents, absent parents, actual mental issues, economic problems, familial stress, physical injuries, drug and alcohol issues and many more things all can play a part.

Bullies are often not evil kids, and a countrywide reaction to bullies Hammurabi style would do an enormous amount of damage too, as would simply overlooking competence, however fair it seems. Yes, there are some kids who would stop bullying if they get punched in the nose but there are many more who stop bullying *you* and move on to a easier target, and that's obviously not an answer from a societal view of things, since not all those bullied can punch the bully in the nose. The best approach is not a blanket one, but one that would take bullies and send them social workers to figure out what the hell is going on to begin with.

Comment Re:How many keyboards do these guys go through? (Score 1) 210

Ok. So I'm assuming this is for people that aren't supporting datacenter based equipment. Y'know the guys that have to plug in thousands of powercords...

So if you're outfitting your cube/desk area, how many keyboards and power cords do you go through? Also, do most FB employees standardize on the 'vending machine' keyboard, or do they have their own personal preference?

I can tell you I wear out a keyboard in about three months and before I switched to "cheapie" Logitech mice, $10 a pop, I was burning through expensive mice every other month. It all depends on how much work you do. After two months the "A" on my keyboard is badly worn and at three months a dozen keys are showing wear. I would say keyboard wear is a good sign of how much work you do. If you can last two or three years on a keyboard you are probably over paid.

I hear you, I absolutely obliterate keyboard, something about the way I type. It's the main reason I switched to Model Ms (and one F) at home: Not being retro, not coolness, but the fact that they actually survive me.

Comment Re:Imagine (Score 2) 160

Hell, this is still done in Unis. I used to run a test cluster for my Uni's chem dept that was basically retired lab machines on home depot wire shelving in our machine room. The only thing that cost money for the dept was the headnode (which as used for staging jobs for the big clusters too, and as a file server for storing job output), the Procurve switches, and my time I suppose too. It was a useful cluster for testing things before they got run on big clusters where time was more metered and for getting grad students familiar with a clustered environment, and all that cost was still cheaper than building a 1 or 2u (or, hell, blade) based system just for this purpose.

To the OP: I used a Debian install on the headnode with Torque for queue management. I netbooted all the machines with the boot image stored there as well, had a couple kernels for the different machines compiled and each clump was separated in the Torque queue. All that made it absurdly easy to update the whole system quickly, but you can also boot the machines locally and for speed you might want to. The main thing you do need to worry about is heat and power consumption, having a lot of machines in one place will each a lot of power and put out a lot of heat. I already had a machine room to toss it all in, don't know if you do.

Comment Re:Result WIll be Opposite of Intent (Score 1) 95

I absolutely guarantee you that all the students have personal gmail accounts, it was one of my factors in initially moving to GApps actually: the students wanted to use them and I'd rather school docs and such were under the school's purview to some extent. Their personal information is far more compromised by their gmail/youtube accounts than by the accounts that I have given a *lecture* to them about having little expectation of privacy on (the fun "I can and will give your email records to the LEA if you try to sell drugs using the account we provide" speech I think got their attention adequately :p).

Comment Though... Thinking about it (Score 1) 95

Google will simply stop offering free GApps for Education for Massachusetts Schools and Non-Profits. The reason the service is free is google is counting on that data. Disclaimer: I am the admin for a small HS and am quite happy with our Google Apps right now

I suppose I should have said "stated intent". The intent is exactly that as far as MS is concerned

Comment Costco (Score 1) 131

I wish that were true, but I remember reading recently that the founder of Costco has been heavily resisting any urges to follow his competitors and slash staff salaries (my god, Costco employees are all paid a living wage, the horror!) and benefits (they all have comprehensive health insurance, the horror!), raise his maximum profit margins on goods (charging more means more money... until the customers leave!), and generally all the other stuff that destroys companies. HE's being urged to do this by Wall St. types who want to see massive short term profits *now* and damn the future

Comment Assumptions... (Score 5, Insightful) 173

This assumes that amazon makes a constant amount every hour, as opposed to peak vs. off-peak business hours. This also assumes that the bulk of their business took their purchases elsewhere while Amazon was done, which I'm not inclined to believe is necessarily true.
Amazon probably lost money, I'm in doubt that it's anywhere close to 5M

Slashdot Top Deals

Happiness is a positive cash flow.

Working...