Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:LOL ... w00t? (Score 2) 292

In his blog, there are a number of comments about the HTML entity he used instead of the hyphen character. There is speculation that text-to-speech accessibility features were mis-interpreting things as a result.

On the TTS note, It seems like HTML (or at least the dialect used for ebooks, but why not everywhere?) should have a tag for providing pronunciation overrides, which would improve accessibility and finally allow us to know how the authors intended the pronunciation of all those apostrophe'd names.

Comment Re:Dont worry, they will just take it from somewhe (Score 2) 330

Did you notice what's not on that list? Cities. All of the urban and suburban development in California accounts for less than 10% of the state's annual water usage (the vast, vast majority is used for agriculture), and the number is dropping every year, as more efficiency and water recycling programs come online.

Sure.. That agricultural usage is completely unrelated to the cities.

Comment Re:Dedicated vs. unlicensed shared use like WiFi (Score 3, Insightful) 66

It's not the wild west. Device in that category still have power and other requirements and must be type-certified by the FCC. The low power (really low propagation...) requirement is precisely what allows an "unlicensed" band to be able to exist, but is a hindrance to things like cell-phones or broadcast anything if you want to have good coverage without having to put stations literally everywhere.

I agree that for those purposes the spectrum should be leased rather than sold, though. It both provides a mechanism for us to evaluate whether a use continues to be valuable and to sunset particular uses (through choosing not to continue the lease after the term is up.) The leases should be auctioned, though.

Comment Re:American wastefulness at its finest (Score 1) 143

Blah blah blah, I don't understand the concept of opportunity cost therefore people should ignore the expense of replacing equipment that is a little wasteful of a resource that is currently very cheap.

You don't need a 1kWe monster for day-to-day tasks, but if you want to have one for special tasks (computer game playing might be a hobby of yours, and is certainly less energy intensive than other hobbies you might have. Auto racing, for example), it might not make sense to also have an 80W computer for general use.

To pay off a $300, 80W machine in this scenario, at US prices you'd need to have like 3000 hours of low-intensity computing tasks. That's the break-even point assuming you're comparing it to a 1kWe monstrosity. If your gaming machine is closer to 500W (still pretty beefy, I'd think, and plenty of quad cores will fit into a balanced machine with that kind of power usage. At least a high mid-range device), it's closer to 6000 hours for break-even.

And it gets worse. It's unlikely that your 1kW monster is actually going to use the full power of all of its components when doing the general tasks, further eroding the advantages the smaller machine has.

Comment Re:obviously they should track the sun (Score 1) 327

Why mount it on the roof? Cut the panels into attractive leaf-like shapes and mount them on several poles driven securely into the ground, pour a patio in between the power flowers. You can put your energy garden anywhere on your property*.

*plan assumes that you have a yard.

Slashdot Top Deals

The system was down for backups from 5am to 10am last Saturday.

Working...