Comment Re:We're ditching Oracle (Score 1) 184
You also do not need 64 cores on each machine to deal with billions of rows.
disclaimer: the company I work for runs a little over a trillion (a trillion as in a thousand billion) records in _ONE_ table, which is also our most used one. That doesn't count the hundreds of other tables.
Yes, the primary source of that data is a commercial database (vertica). Its also not an RDBMS (doing the kind of stuff we do even on an Oracle DB would be absurd). But we do use open postgresql and other open source non-relational dbs for the datamarts, and they'll easily take a few billion records.
Sure, you could dump the trillion records in an RDBMS with "hundreds of gigs of ram". But that is downright retarded for anything but the most specialized scenarios. Even big finance no longer do that shit.