But how many people didn't figure it out. And how many valuable comments were lost as a result?
They moved the link into a little cartoon bubble on the right. If people were too stupid to figure that out I'm having trouble believing they would have had anything valuable to contribute.
I spend a lot of money to live in a nice location in downtown Seattle, and cable TV and Internet are not available on my block. DSL is spotty, and since I live on the top floor, there's no way to make it work. The cabling to the building and inside the building is just too old.
Doesn't sound like such a nice location to me.
Mod: +1, Hopefully.
If you want to play Red Herring, whatever.
What's your excuse for Firefox?
adult webcams?
That's how I read it.
- Non-descriptive, generic company name -- check.
- Hosts lots of cameras for outside access -- check.
- Viewers are paying customers -- check
It's not really Chrome. It's a Chrome shell for Webkit.
Apple still does not allow third-party HTML renders.
It can be short (length) and full height and fit fine in cube chassis like a CoolerMaster Elite 110, or a low-profile case that uses a horizontal riser.
they worded it badly but pretty much they are complaining that amazon is selling the fire TV and other media sticks, while banning KODI, which without addons is not any different.
Seems like an issue with anti competitive behavior
Why does the foundation find this "absurd"? Just sounds like business as usual for content/platform lock-in and large companies using their control over a marketplace to remove competition.
Kinda reminds me of how Apple removes apps that "duplicate functionality built into iOS" and then at the same time "adopts" features of the best third-party utilities in new iOS versions.
If it was less than $10 it might not have even been 4x8GB.
According to their website, you're lucky to get ONE drive for less than $10.
Buying flash drives in retail stores is like buying USB and HDMI cables in stores -- an exercise only to be done when you really HAVE to have it now. For everything else, there's NewEgg and Monoprice.
If people are claiming that you're throttling their torrents they may be having an issue with their service in general that is keeping them from utilizing the connection to the full potential. These issues may be with the customer's own equipment or networking, or indicative of an issue with the service itself.
What is the result of your technical support department's investigations into these issues?
Why would you be throttling ports? There's nothing illegal about using torrents.
Sounds like these people are simply using the service they paid for.
the time Windows 95 was introduced, in 1995.
In case we thought that the 95 stood for something else.
If it was Google who wrote Windows, we would have hit Windows 95 back in the 1980s.
He probably wasn't happy with the ones he got, regardless of how correct they were.
More accurately, it's a dupe of the exact same summary (with no paragragh break).
Yup, Microsoft and Facebook -- it's like a marriage made in Hell. Or data-mining Heaven, depending on your point of view.
Friction is a drag.
