There's not only too much javascript, it looks like you've got some sort of movie trying to load. (I didn't wait for it to time out, but I think it would have.)

I can easily handle most stores, but not that one.

A huge number of environmental problems could be solved if we could just get couples to have only 1 child. One side effect of this would be an aging population and reduction in labor force. But health care improvements and automation could cushion that.

It would require a huge amount of social engineering. Which is much harder than anything technical.

There is no open market. Ever. Deal with it.

Nice quote:
"You know what they do with engineers when they turn 40? They take them out and shoot them."

From the movie "Primer" see http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/P...

The last programming Language I can think of which was whitespace dependent was Fortran 77. And whitespace dependence was removed as soon as possible in Fortran 90.

Welcome to the 70's!

I never have problems with "R statistical"

How much energy would that take? What is the cost in creating the heat shielding?

It is mostly produced from hydrocarbon fractionation, mostly natural gas fractionation. It can also be produced from coal. It there does nothing to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and the process release large amounts of CO2. So, in my opinion, it is a useless road to go down and a scam.

Actually much of commercial hydrogen comes from some form of natural gas in a process called hydrocarbon fractonation.. Hydrogen is a scam run by the fossil fuels industry. It can in fact be produced by running live steam over coal. Wiki it up if you do not believe me.

Why limit it to nations? Major corporations are as capable as most countries, and only a little bit more endangered if caught.

Despite the "only security through obscurity" meme, you need to understand it, not just say it.

There are only two types of security:
1) security through obscurity,
and,
2) security through inaccessibility.
They can, however, be intelligently combined.

Please note that private key encryption is security through obscurity. Cutting the phone line is security through inaccessibility. Saying that "it's secure because they can't get the prime factors of that key" is security through obscurity.

Despite the meme, security through obscurity is widely and properly used. What's wrong if false obscurity, which is common. If you don't properly assess just how obscure your secret is, then you have a security failure.

So having a monoculture is reduced security, because that means that there are a much larger number of entities seeking to discover the secret...and any breach in security cannot be easily contained. If you don't have a monoculture, then a single breach cannot be as widely damaging, and is thus also less valuable to find. This is a sort of network effect.

OTOH, a diverse community means that more effort needs to be devoted to security, because each branch is a separate thing to be maintained. So it's not all benefit or all loss, it's a mixture.

FWIW, I choose not to have flash installed on my system, despite the fact that it would have some utility, because I consider that the weakness that it presents is not worth the benefit. The ability of refuse to have such a service installed allows increased security...at a cost. For some people the cost is higher than they are willing to pay. This reduction of the attack surface is a form of security through obscurity mixed with security through inaccessibility, i.e., I have become inaccessible to some forms of attact, and I have reduced my visibility to many attackers.

Anything like that, IIRC, is administered by the GSA.

Don't tell a Jews that. The Nazis sold it as being part of an anti-Jewish anti-Communist crusade.

Is there an employment ad somewhere you can point to back up your claim?