Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Not me (Score 2) 152

I wouldn't be caught dead sharing my wi-fi. There are companies that try to make a living threatening to sue you if they see downloads coming from your IP. Even if you're innocent it costs more to litigate than to just pay, but you're still out $5k...

Comment Bullshit (Score 2, Interesting) 940

sorta anyway. The thing I hate about "inflation" is that when most folks talk about it they include luxury goods (BMWs, yachts, vacation homes, etc). Nobody ever talks about real inflation: Food, Shelter, Healthcare, Eduction, Transportation. I guess that's not 1 thing, but for the working class it's what really matters.

Comment Um...no (Score 3, Insightful) 940

God I'm sick of folks trying to fit the supply/demand crap they learned in High School into the real world. The problem is _real_ simple:

1. Real Wages have been falling for 40 years, to the point where wages for many jobs are what they were 20 years ago after 20 years of inflation. Outsourcing + lack of protectionism and free trade nonsense did this.

2. Capital has concentrated into the hands of a lucky few (the "1%" as they're called) and they have no incentive to build more houses when they're making obscene profits off the existing supply.

Said it before, say it again: Globalism _breaks_ capitalism. All your left with is oligarchy and kleptocracy.

Comment sigh... It depends... (Score 1) 940

there's other ways this can play out. We've been putting all our eggs in one basket and letting the top 1% have almost all the capital. There's very few people with the money to build a sizable number of homes. Those people are part of the investor class, and they're going to put their money where it will make money.

So if you figured out that flooding the market with houses will devalue the existing properties (which they own, since they own damn near everything) what makes you think they haven't? And if that's the case what's to say they won't just skip the whole "Supply" part of "Supply and Demand"? What do we do when 1% of the population has all the capital and they decide to limit supply to increase the value of that capital? In the past it was violent revolution, but with today's military and police that's not really an option.

Now would be a good time to start doing something about income inequality and wealth concentration. Either that or get used to the idea of a new "Dark Ages"...

Comment Colorado sure has nice beaches (Score 1) 940

Can't wait to go see 'em.

And did you read the grandparent? The supply is being constricted by billionaire fuckholes buying up all the existing properties instead of building new ones because it's _way_ more profitable to own a limited supply than to make more. Supply & Demand breaks down when you get the kinds of crazy rich we have here in America because they start actively molding the markets.

Comment Um.. how? (Score 2) 381

it's all well and good to say don't buy a cell phone but a) it puts you at a social disadvantage and b) it only really saves about $1200 year for a family of 3, but rent on a crummy 3 bedroom apartment is damn near that. So after 10 years I can't even pay a years worth of rent...

Millennials have already cut the cord. They have Internet, but they needed that to get their jobs. In America where these abuses happen most you have to own a car or again, no job. Sure, you might get by for a year or two without one, but pretty soon you're gonna have to leave your job for a better one. That's how you move up now.

See, wages in this country have been declining for everyone but the top 1% for 40 years. It's gotten to the point where a job pays the same now as it did in 1995 after 20 years of inflation. Unless you won the lottery in life (rich parent, good genetics that make math a cinch, etc) you're not gonna save shit. It's all the rank and file can do to keep their heads above water.

Still, it does feel good to keep telling ourselves that if we just save a little money it'll all work out. It beats the hell out of facing how fuck we really, really are...

Comment What I took from the parent (Score 1) 668

was two things:

1. He drunk the bottle, not her, to show her it was nonsense.

2. (More importantly) She thought she was buying real medicine. Not sure what country the parent's in, but in America $250 isn't out of the ordinary for a drug not covered by your insurance, so the high price wouldn't necessarily be a tip off. Assuming I'm not just putting words in the parent's mouth than that's the scary part for me: that Homeopathy is indistinguishable from clinically tested medicine to an intelligent woman.

Comment Re:Meh (Score 1) 368

I appreciate your reply, though please note that the post you're replying to was incomplete; Slashdot's lousy UI went ahead and posted it while I was in the middle of writing it. For the whole thing (revised slightly) see here: http://entertainment.slashdot....

Anyway, I don't have any qualms with rightsholders complaining about, or refusing to assign or license rights to, businesses that they disagree with. That's their choice. But the music industry is in a bad way right now. Siding with Apple might be a bad choice, but refusing to deal with them might also be a worse one. There probably isn't a good option to choose.

Most people won't buy CDs if they can buy tracks online. Most people won't buy tracks online if they can stream; music purchase is already dying if you look at the numbers. Most people won't pay for streaming if they can stream for free. And most people won't do any of those things if the cost and inconvenience is even moderate, because piracy is free and quite easy also.

(Note also that because an individual's taste in music typically ossify, once they've got a big enough collection, barring format shifts, which don't happen anymore, you basically lose them as a customer. You'd better hope that they stream instead of collecting, and that if they collect, they pay for it instead of pirate it)

Like it or lump it, this is the reality that participants in the music industry need to face. Bitching about Apple isn't going to change it.

Comment Isn't this just on demand processing? (Score 1) 107

The last time Microsoft had a major Xbox Live outage due to high demand they just spun up a bunch of VMs and everything was fine 4 hours later. You keep them idling so that when you need 'em they're ready on a moments notice. Also if you're not Microsoft or Oracle this means you're not paying the licensing costs associated with the software being in production non stop.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster. - Voltaire

Working...