He didn't mention attack. There are other venues.

You voided your own argument by 1) typing it on a computer and 2) admitting you were watching a movie. Both appliances get stolen all the time. Your last argument is garbage. They'll break into a house to rummage and *see* if you have things, even personal things. Short of it - I don't believe you AC.

I'm sure you understand yet avoid, that the *simplest* solution to all of this is **not to steal**. In other words, the onus of the situation is squarely on the perpetrator.

Instead, you advocate a laid-back attitude of being a willing victim. Right up until that thief breaking in decides that causing you or yours bodily harm is a fun thing to do, which they have certainly been known to do. Then, you'll scream about lack of state protection, assuming you are left capable.

Anyone thinking they have the right to decide that the time I've spent building my life is up for grabs had better expect the exact same disdain for theirs.

Don't break into their house. Easy remedy.

Google disagrees.

Your little experiment is an example of not "behaving properly".

Ah yes, that projected "may" as if it were fact.

If you truly believe this, then you must conclude that blacks are quite racist because they get bent out of shape over this issue.

...I mean, it's the miracle substance you can do anything with, so maybe you can use it to make graphene! :D

Or your post simply disappears if it doesn't jibe with their views.

Same thing could be accomplished with an Epic Rant Battle.

Really? Got a cite for that?

*Every* generation has altered the living conditions passed to the next. Now that your main point is collapsed, mind swallowing your own ad hominem?

Whitehead's theory of gravitation is still about gravity. So, everything from "Clearly" on is straw.

...and you didn't. The text you quoted neither says nor implies that that's a traditional strength. (In the text you quoted, the word traditional is used as an adjective modifying "languages".)