Comment Why do I need the vendor lock-in? (Score 2) 85
I do not develop big complicated documents on my phone.
For my phone, a standard text editor is more than enough.
If somebody emails a
I do not develop big complicated documents on my phone.
For my phone, a standard text editor is more than enough.
If somebody emails a
Seems that, for some people, Google cannot possibly do anything right.
No matter matter Google does, or does not do, some people have to find some reason to hate Google anyway.
I thought that was gone five years ago.
Don't get me wrong, I am happy to see Disney criticized.
But tech companies like: IBM, Microsoft, and Facebook, are *far* worse H1B abusers than Disney.
And Indian contracting firms are probably a bigger H1B scammer than the US companies combined.
I guess everybody will figure that the problem has been solved now.
That is what I understand. Water used for fracking cannot be recycled, you cannot get the fracking chemicals out.
Trillions of gallons of fresh water are gone for good.
Seems like they are singling out one search engine to be treated differently than others. Hard for me to see how that is fair. Just because Google has been successful, is no reason that the law should not be applied evenly. I guess that is how Europe "thinks."
I don't know if any US president has ever over-stepped his authority as constantly as Obama.
> Millenials are often touted as "technology gurus" and "digital natives" because of the fact that they grew up from birth with modern computers
IMO: knowing how to use Facebook, and how to take selfies, is not my idea of a technology guru.
Learning MS-Office is not learning "computer science" anymore than learning to use the copy machine is electrical engineering.
Maybe we should "computer usage skills" or something?
A course in algorithms is computer science, not learning to use MS-Windows.
As I understand it, if Oracle loses, they might set a precedent which allow others companies to sue Oracle.
Article makes it sound like this is some silly squabble among nerds. Like an argument over a StarTrek episode.
I suspect a lot of non-nerd people may be surprised about the far-reaching implications of this decision.
EPA Study Says Fracking Pollutes Drinking Water
June 4, 2015
> “Despite industry’s obstruction, EPA found that fracking pollutes water in a number of ways,” said Earthworks policy director Lauren Pagel. “That’s why industry didn’t cooperate. They know fracking is an inherently risky, dirty process that doesn’t bear close, independent examination.”
> The report also pointed out the declining amount of water that could be available for drinking purposes due to extended drought, saying, “The future availability of drinking water sources that are considered fresh in the U.S. will be affected by changes in climate and water use. Declines in surface water resources have already led to increased withdrawals and cumulative net depletions of ground water in some areas.”
> And, while saying it didn’t find evidence of widespread impacts on drinking water to date, the U.S. EPA report did conclude, “The colocation of hydraulic fracturing activities with drinking water resources increases the potential for these activities to affect the quality and quantity of current and future drinking water resources. While close proximity of hydraulically fractured wells to drinking water resources does not necessarily indicate that an impact has or will occur, information about the relative location of wells and water supplies is an initial step in understanding where impacts might occur.”
http://ecowatch.com/2015/06/04/epa-fracking-pollutes-drinking-water/
"An organization dries up if you don't challenge it with growth." -- Mark Shepherd, former President and CEO of Texas Instruments