Technically speaking, if you're 100% sure in advance that they're going to fuck up then that is less uncertain.

Getting rid of that salt in a way that wouldn't cause catastrophic harm would be no mean feat.

Form it into blocks and build houses with it. It doesn't rain that often down there, does it?

If you're inside the object, only the radius below you counts. Theoretically. I mean who spends significant amounts of time underground?

I remember my grandpa used to go on about them.

pucker sensors in the seats

Presumably these detect when the occupants are frightened?

a computer programs[sic] while they can gather lots of data cannot interpret what they are seeing.

All they have to do is look where they're going and they're level with the average carbon unit.

No it's not. If it was, Rugby matches would be 5-a-side after 30 minutes and by 10 p.m. on Friday the pubs would just close because all the customers were in casualty & police cells.

Have you ever even been outside?

the binge-y sprawl of the Netflix format

The fucking what, man?

[Aside: I'll have a pint of what he's been snorting]

I'm obviously doing something wrong. My hit rate's barely a thi
[brb - door]
--
G.Glitter

Should they be allowed to watch you urinate?

Should they be allowed to watch you defecate?

The government? Hell no.

But if Twiglebook and their selected partners wish to serve up targeted ads to enhance my waste elimination experience then sign me up!

You see a clear statement of intent. Others see what we refer to in the Queen's English as gobbing off.

By the powers vested in me by my Atlanta GED I proclaim ... 75!

Nobody (sane) is saying don't use the reviews. Just have the default assumption that they may not be honest unbiased opinions because to do otherwise is foolish.

On what basis would you discard that default assumption? Because if you can't think of one[1], it comes back to not using them.

[1] apart from if you actually know the person. In which case you could ask him anyway, which still isn't using the review.

Something doesn't need to be hot (by some arbitrary criterion) to be hotter than something else.

But that is a long way from 'fine' since we would lose many of the societal advances of the past thousand years

You think he'd notice trivial details like that?