Non-international (most in my experience) US keyboards don't have an AltGr key. They do have a right Alt key.
Also, the default US keymap causes AltGr to function as a normal Alt.

Note this response took too long to compose, so there have already been some good/better answers below, Prograph, LabView, and the comments about APL are all relevant and interesting

Random idea on how to get around it:

Starting point: utilize some esoteric language that use a limited symbol set and positional coding, i.e. funges. In this case, the screen would be a scrollable grid (say 3x4, for 12 tiles in view at one time), and you would press on grid locations to set their value, possibly through a sub-menu, possibly by just cycling through choices, or maybe a gesture system.
Going further, each grid position wouldn't necessarily be limited to a single symbol, it could be a symbol plus inputs selectable by sub-menu. This would allow you to use multiple registers, not just a single stack. Then, you could save sub-programs with defined inputs/outputs as functions to a library. You could possibly even start putting together classes.
Once you get to the object oriented side, the strict grid might be too limiting, at that level it might be better to view objects as packages, which you can draw connections between. Programming by flowchart/object model.

You won't excise typing completely, because you will need to put in strings at some point. However, class names/function names/variables could all be custom icons.

If they are licensed as a media transfer/derivative work. In the US one of the first major series of copyright cases was about player piano rolls, which contain less data than some MIDI files.

http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html

Even, it's #12. The ordering possibly got broken starting with Generations. However, the only movie in the Next-Gen that people agree was good was First Contact.

Vulpecula - Little Vixen, it differs slightly in connotation from the article's translation of Fox.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC250.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB901.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie

Well, this would probably work because there are churches that are willing to marry same-sex couples. So they could be married, and have their civil union the same as different-sex couples.
    Due to the overwhelming number of statutes at all levels of government, it would require an amendment to the United States Constitution to catch all of the usages. One of the general rules of conservatism (in the United States) is a reluctance to pass constitutional amendments at that level. I don't see social progressives (again using United States standards for the words) willing to cede the word "marriage" to religious institutions. That means that while this is a potential solution, it has a low chance of implementation.
  The other argument being presented is that marriage shouldn't be religious at all, those trappings being added (according to others in this conversation) after Europeans started routinely coming to the Americas.

Incest - a mechanism would need to be put into place to prevent incestuous couples from having children, due to the preponderance of genetic abnormalities that occur within such relationships. Incest is currently not defined the same in every state, the only consistent parts being direct ancestors/descendants (mother/son, grandfather/granddaughter) and siblings. In most states, marriage to first cousins once removed (your grandparent's sibling's child) is allowed.

Bestiality - is generally considered a matter of consent, similar to rape. Animals cannot give consent and cannot enter into contracts, and both parties need to consent for the marriage to go through. The way underaged marriage is currently handled may provide a framework, since in many of those cases, the parents of the underaged party(ies) can validate the contract (although there are still limits where even that is not the case).

- Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

- Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

I'd love to live in your magical land that has a pile of ISPs. I get a choice between ATT and TimeWarner, which both suck.

All of those points are valid, they just aren't dollar-signs.
Although, the time one can be debated if you are staying in the business-center of a large metropolitan area (a very specific case). Then traffic will usually negate any time savings from a car, especially if there is rail as opposed to buses.

The reason why the Constitution had to be amended is that the Fuller court (incorrectly) decided that whether income was from property or not determined whether it was a direct tax or duty. Prior to this ruling it was understood that an income tax was always a duty and not a direct tax, so did not have to be apportioned. The 16th amendment doesn't create the income tax, it just says that the income tax doesn't have to be apportioned even if under the Fuller interpretation it would be a direct tax.

The case is explicitly about holding the phone in your hand while using it.

The argument in this case (which is an appeals case) is over how broad the law is, and whether it applies.

Some choice statements from the judge:

The judge also addresses section 23123.5 which makes it illegal to text (specifically) on a wireless communications device. He indicates that he thinks this was passed to catch non-cellphones, not because the previous section was limited to listening and talking. Throughout he uses some of the legislative notes as context (I think incorrectly - specifically there is a note for 23123.5 by the author of both sections that indicates he believed the first section is only enforceable when holding a cellphone up to your ear, and the second section was added to catch people using devices in a different way). In the end he says that someone should probably bring it up to the legislature if they think 23123 is too broad and 23123.5 is too narrow in illogical ways.