Actually at the heart of the matter is the entire concept of individual freedom. I know, it's not popular with the mob to talk about individual freedom, in a mob there are no individuals, thus - the mob.

However though my argument always falls on deaf ears I will not stop making it. It is the freedom of the individual that is at stake every time the collective (the mob, the majority and their violent armed proxy force known as the government) decides to impose more rules, the fewer individual freedoms are left untouched by this violence and oppression.

And it is violence and oppression. I would not pay 1 penny in income, wealth and any form of income redistributing taxes if it were not for so called 'legal' and 'legitimate' violence of the state. But the state derives its authority from the governed, so I hear. But the governed supposedly do not themselves have the right to steal from each other, to imprison each other and to murder each other. Yet the government has this authority. So what gives the government this authority? Clearly the governed do not have that power, so how can they give that power if they themselves don't have it? Well they cannot. The entire concept is absurd and as far as I am concerned illegal, illegitimate, immoral.

My point is: the government itself doesn't actually have the authority to delegate who is allowed to do what for living, to instrument licenses, to legislate business and labour, to control and legislate money, any of it. As long as I exist on this planet I see all of it as illegitimate and as such I will never respect any of it, nor will I agree with it and I see it as my primary objective to deny any and all governments any and all authority over me.

As such my position is that it is the most important moral imperative to undermine all government activities and laws in every way.

And the problem with not stealing property from people is???? I get it, we want to steal as a society, apparently society agreed that it consists of unbelievable pieces of total puke laden shit induced gangrenous fish cunts and not people, who are absolutely on board for any kind of theft possible and they want the government with guns to go and do the dirty work on their behalf. Apparently they want to seem 'legit' while doing it. Dirtbags.

- unclear? What was unclear about using taxes to beat individual States into submission? It was exceedingly clear that Congress put language into the law on purpose to force States to set up their own exchanges or be subject to taxes without getting any benefits from them. That was as clear as day.

Some States called the bluff of the Congress on this crap and SCOTUS bailed Congress out. It was never unclear, it was perfectly clear and SCOTUS knowingly broke the law.

The country should not be known as the United States of America at all, there is nothing United about it. It should be known as the IDA - ILLEGAL Dictatorship of America.

- or as they said in 1984: war is peace. "To be free of payment for a service" is not at all the same thing as to be free from government oppression. "To be free of payment for a service" = provide government with tools of oppression to take from somebody else to pay for my service, to allow government to steal, imprison and murder people so that I can have the service I feel entitled to.

"To be free" does not mean not to have to pay for your own life's needs and choices, it means not to have other people dictate to you how you live, but clearly you don't know that.

- the only reason to not burn all of your savings by the life end is to pass it to your own children and survivors, not to some unknown to you people, that makes no sense at all. I am going to argue that anybody who owns any property should be able to exercise complete control over that property without having any taxes charged by any government whatsoever and this means they must be able to pass that property to anybody whatsoever of their choosing and it is none of government's or the mob's business. But of-course the mob uses the oppression of the government to do their dirty work for them, to steal from a minority to subsidise themselves. It's is immoral and economically unsound behaviour and it is 'legalized' by the corrupt system that exists.

I feel the need. The need to provide a competing to Google play store site where any and all activities will be allowed.

Google has their right to control their private property, which is what their site is. Other people may have different opinions on their own sites. Of course the phone or tablet has to be unjailed from Google prison.

Ok, if you want to defend your idea of what people should be doing with their own health and money based on some socialist ideology that's one thing, but stop fucking lying, unless you are so misinformed that you don't know that the way this wording in this 'law' was drafted was to ensure that the individual States fall in line by promising to use their money to subsidise other States if they themselves didn't participate in what the Feds wanted.

This fucking illegal piece of shit law passed ONLY due to the language that you now call 'poorly drafted', if that language wasn't there this piece of shit illegal law could not pass.

USA should be known as Illegal States of America specifically because it is not a nation of laws but a nation of men.

The 3 judges who went against the ILLEGAL law were trying to preserve the nation of laws, the people on the bench who for political reasons upheld the illegal law have crossed the t and dotted the i for you.

USA doesn't exist, now it's ISA.

How are financial transactions not free speech? If I want to be able to BUY A PRODUCT or to DONATE MONEY I should not be forced to disclose any of that information to a government agency just because they want to know what I like to buy, read, use, whatever.

That is absolutely free speech, ultimately all of the freedoms that people think are important are completely useless and fall flat on their face if the most important freedom - freedom to earn money, freedom to spend money is not actually protected from government oppression.

You think being able to spend or earn money without being oppressed is somehow outside of individual freedom protections because it's money? Money, time, any possessions are worth nothing if you do not have protections against government oppression, which means you cannot be protected from government taking anything it wants away from you, preventing you from doing stuff to earn a living (and I am not talking about harming others while earning a living, that's the purview of criminal justice system).

Being able to stop you from advertising your services because some government official wants to own that piece of business for himself or for a donor... THAT is what individual rights are - protection against government oppression. A right is protection against government oppression and only government oppression. A right has nothing to do with transactions and dealings between individuals and / or companies.

Why is that? Because government is an institution that has supposedly legal and legitimate power to oppress you! No corporation, no other individual has legal and legitimate power to oppress you. A private individual (or a company) oppressing you is a matter for courts and justice systems, but a government oppressing you is a matter of policy and governance and nobody in government will ever be punished for oppressing you, so you have to prevent the oppression from happening, you cannot rely or expect retribution after the fact.

The only meaningful individual rights have to do with preventing government oppression against taking your stuff and your freedom and your life.

Any move to deanonymize any activity that has nothing to do with harming others is a move towards government oppression.

Governments and any other powerful entities of the world: fuck you all, go fuck yourselves .com

People must be able to exercise free speech and that is that.

This: pope is a paedophile .com - this may be libel, if there is an actual lawful reason to disclose the contact for a site a that would be between a judge and a registrar.

US Military to Develop Star Wars Style Hoverbikes With British Company is an earlier headline. Now it's Lexus creating a hoverboard.

They should combine their efforts but then the USA military will only be able to use those bikes in wars on planets or at least roads made of metal. Maybe the first sign of USA planning an attack will be USA offering a country to pave their roads with sheet metal.

I am part of free market, I am not government. Making individual choices to buy or not to buy a product is a free market decision, so nothing at all in that reply that makes even a hint of any kind of sense.

Good luck having healthy people in an unhealthy market.

I am sorry, but come up with a different way to put together that chassis, I am not driving a thing that is made of Lego pieces bolted together in real life. A few laps on the track, Ok, IRL on a real road with real potholes and real asphalt and gravel, etc? Hmmm. I don't want pieces of my car becoming pieces of the road or pieces of my body.

What is this small tlevel thinking? Think big, just build the death star already. At least death star works on known tech, to build hover bike you have to learn to hover first. Death star - just think of all the beautiful tasty porkbarrel spending! Mmm