The number of guns used in those rapes and murders dropped once
Actually in the uk gun crime has doubled as well since the ban.
The UK and Australia tried it, and we can see what the results really are - twice as much violent crime.
The far more interesting thing is violent crime has gone up for those areas that enacted gun bans while for the rest of the world violent crime has actually gone way down.
I don't understand, can you please express this as a car analogy.
All you really need is a sybian or a hitachi.
We bought a lockable steel cabinet for the garage for storing those.
There's the consoles and all the video games., The couple of shelves of board games and then the pen and paper RPG bookcases. Then there's the collection of soft toys that started as monitor decorations and grew from there.
I'm glad you don't. I certainly hate them too, but you don't see me reaching for my rifle! Schmucks like you give gun-banners something to wield.
In his defense going out and shooting at little bits of paper is likely a more productive use of his time, and an excellent alternative to sitting on the computer when your internet is too slow.
I made touch powder in chemistry and put it up around the school on filter paper attached to noticeboards labeled "Scratch and Sniff"
You must have very small Deer in the US.
US deer are grazers so their heads tend to be low to the ground despite standing much taller. We dont have carnivorous deer that go for our hearts like you seem to have in Germany.
Aha, so you missed the original quote, i'll try bolding the relevant parts this time.
Also, WPA2-Enterprise is pretty secure if you only use TLS auth, not TTLS where you use a username/password combo (too easy for a MITM)
I was specifically replying to that part, as TLS and TTLS both have the same degree of mitm vulnerability with properly configured clients.
If the server cert fails in TLS or TTLS then MITM is a possibility, you dont need the username/password or client cert to mitm a TLS connection, just the server cert.
Actually for that matter wouldnt a compromised server certificate leave you vulnerable to a proxy attack anyway where you would use the compromised server cert to pretend to be the access point communicating with the proper radius server thus giving MITM on TLS or TTLS the same? You might not get the actual client cert on TLS but you would have their traffic all the same.
If server cert validation has failed chances are your CA was compromised, in which case the attacker could just generate client certs at will anyway....
not TTLS where you use a username/password combo (too easy for a MITM)
TTLS properly configured is no easier to MITM than properly configured TLS, you should be using server cert validation with either.
Bah. I forgot the gaming consoles when I did the count in my head, that changes my vote from 7-8 to 10+. It's a 2 person household.
or a feral possum.
This place just isn't big enough for all of us. We've got to find a way off this planet.
