Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cloud

Submission + - IBM working on Watson app for smartphones (extremetech.com)

MrSeb writes: "After conquering Jeopardy, battling patent trolls, and chasing down health insurance fraudsters, IBM now plans to bring Watson to smartphones. In essence, IBM is hoping to build a better, faster, and more professional/enterprisey version of Apple’s Siri, the voice-controlled assistant that debuted on the iPhone 4S. Each IBM Watson installation is a 10-rack supercomputer with a total of 2880 processor threads (90 Power7 CPUs clocked at 3.5GHz, each with eight cores, and each core with four threads). There is 16TB of RAM, and the entire thing is embarrassingly parallel — it can process 500 gigabytes of data per second. Now, don’t worry — IBM isn’t trying to shrink the room-sized Watson down to the size of a smartphone. Instead, we’re simply looking at a smartphone app that directly interfaces with an internet-connected Watson installation. In theory, Watson’s question answering ability would utterly blow Siri and Google Now out of the water. While Siri can set your alarms, Watson can parse a patient’s charts and provide clinical diagnoses and pharmaceutical prescriptions. Where Siri can tell you whether you’ll need an umbrella, you could ask Watson whether now is the right time to plant your crops — or for a complete walkthrough on how to fix your toaster."
Bitcoin

Submission + - WikiLeaks Bypasses Financial Blockade With Bitcoin (forbes.com)

cold fjord writes: A surprising real world example of bitcoin in action: On its public bitcoin address, Wikileaks has taken in over $32,000 equivalent in more than 1,100 separate bitcoin donations throughout the blockade (1BTC = $10.00). But these amounts may be significantly higher, because it does not even include the individually-generated bitcoin addresses that WikiLeaks provides for donors upon request. Also announced last month, WikiLeaks appears to have found another way around the VISA and Mastercard blockade by using the French national credit card system, Carte Bleue, to process these payments (at least temporarily).
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft Orders A DMCA Takedown for Windows 8 Screenshots (ngohq.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A few days ago, we published a screenshots gallery of Microsoft Windows 8 RTM. Just for the record, we produced all of the screenshots ourselves. But apparently posting screenshots of Microsoft's software is considered a copyright infringement... or at least that's what Microsoft claims.

Submission + - Republican platform to include Internet Freedom plank (dailycaller.com) 1

jay.madison writes: "The new Republican Party platform includes language which promises action to promote freedom on the Internet. The move is being driven by Rand Paul's libertarian wing of the party. The text, which is still in draft form, says Republicans will work to guarantee that "individuals retain the right to control the use of their data by third parties," and that "personal data receives full constitutional protection from government overreach." Republicans would resist moves toward international governance of the Internet, and seek to "remove regulatory barriers that protect outdated technologies and business plans from innovation and competition, while preventing legacy regulation from interfering with new technologies such as mobile delivery of voice and video data as they become crucial components of the Internet ecosystem.” The platform is due to be adopted at the Republican National Convention next week."
Security

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: How can the tech savy individual secure his/her home? 3

tezbobobo writes: "After having my car broken into for the third time this year, and with the police not even attending, what steps can I take? With an infinite budget this would be easy, but noone has that. I've already installed security lights, but what else can the tech savvy individual do?"
Programming

Submission + - Large NYC Realtor Stole My Code, What Do I Do? 2

An anonymous reader writes: I am a website software engineer in South Carolina, and a person in New York contacted me for a website job — one half of a job (the "front end") she was given by a very prominent NYC real estate company to redo their site as HTML5.

After agreeing over email to do the work in exchange for an emailed invoice and to receive payment no later than 2 weeks after the work is completed, I spent 10 hours on the work and sent the $1,000 invoice for the completed job. Along the way, a technical limitation within web browsers was discovered (a XSS security safeguard) that caused one page to require to be implemented differently than the others' structure, so I emailed her to seek approval to use a workaround that, while being an exception to the way the other pages were implemented, did not harm the site's look or functionality. She approved it via email, the page was completed as agreed on, and she emailed me that it was fine and thanked me.

After the site was completed, she cited the above workaround (which she, via email, approved) as a reason not to pay the invoice, along with other negligible requirements which were not documented at any point during the work (such as "don't delete code, just comment it out").

I asked her to pay the invoice twice during and after the two week period, but received no response. I also called the NYC real estate company the code would wind up in the hands of and explained the situation, and though they said they would look into it (a VP and principal of the company via three-way, documented phone call), I heard nothing more.

A month has gone by, I have received no pay nor correspondence from any party involved, and today I discovered that the real estate company's production site is hosting the code I wrote, serving live traffic and being used to provide real estate services for profit to customers.

Is this not a simple case of stolen property on behalf of the woman I wrote the code for, and the real estate company hosting the stolen property all the same as if they downloaded a Hollywood MPAA movie and allowed people to play it free on their site?

Also, a little research shows that I can sue businesses across state lines (though not individuals) in small claims court, which in SC is up to $5,000 in damages. Can this be confirmed and maybe further evidenced via precedent? Will there be a pretrial hearing to establish jurisdiction here since I wrote the code here? And finally, should I sue the original lady client's sole proprietorship (which all the emails were sent to, her domain name for her business therefore establishing that she was acting under her business and not "under the table tax-free" I'd imagine) first to establish that property was stolen before going after the realtor for hosting my stolen property citing the previous trial as a precedent?
DRM

Submission + - New DRM-Free Label Announced (defectivebydesign.org)

jrepin writes: "Awareness has been spreading among individuals, businesses and other organizations that DRM is a completely unnecessary restriction of freedom, and it drives people away. As that awareness spreads, going "DRM-Free" becomes more and more valuable for patrons. To really build upon that image and to provide a resource for people to learn about why being DRM-Free matters, a logo was created for suppliers to proudly advertise that their files all come unencumbered by restrictive technologies. Some among early adopters are O'Reilly Media, ClearBits, Momentum Books, and ccMixter."

Submission + - Buckyballs Magnets Banned by Feds (gizmodo.com)

SicariusMan writes: Looks like warnings and other precautions were not enough to save Buckyballs Magnets. According to this article the Feds are concerned about the increase in children swallowing the rare earth magnets. Amazon and others have already agreed to stop selling the toys.
Government

Submission + - US House Passes Ron Paul Bill To Audit The Fed (usatoday.com)

damn_registrars writes: "By a vote of 327 — 98, the US House Of Representatives passed a bill today authored by Ron Paul to audit the federal reserve bank. This has been a primary platform for the Texas Republican for some three decades now. The bill is not currently slated to be considered in the Senate, however."

Comment Re:Contempt of Court? (Score 4, Informative) 184

Did not reveal anything? Only a diplomatic embarrassment? At least check Google or something before making a statement like that.

You apparently haven't seen http://www.iraqwarlogs.com/, which is a good place to start. Also check out http://www.collateralmurder.com/.

There's evidence of many war crimes committed by the US, not merely something embarrassing. Things like this NEED to be exposed, not hidden away with the reasoning of "You took an oath to keep it secret." Sometimes you have to break an oath if the ones who told you to keep quiet are doing evil things.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Users never use the Help key.

Working...