Comment Re:Not a steel surface (Score 1) 102
Superconductors just exclude magnetic flux. I am not getting how it matters what produces the magnetic flux - be it ferromagnetic or electromagnetic. My only Meissner effect demo used a permanent magnet.
Superconductors just exclude magnetic flux. I am not getting how it matters what produces the magnetic flux - be it ferromagnetic or electromagnetic. My only Meissner effect demo used a permanent magnet.
We have nVidia helping but not making their own Open Source driver. Intel, after a long period of Open Drivers, said it would require BLOBs for future graphical interfaces. AMD helps with Open Drivers more than nVidia so far but doesn't support them.
Maybe you need a Slashdot License. They come from the Ministry of Housinge.
There is no theoretical reason that a room-temperature superconductor cannot exist.
Room-temperature superconductors would be really cool. It's not clear that electromagnetic propulsion gets you to orbit, though. Once there, sure it works.
Multiple-Tesla fields that are changing their orientation rapidly in time aren't particularly healthy to be around. Induced currents in your nerves, heating, etc. That MRI field is acceptable because it's DC. That is, if you don't have any ferromagnetic objects on you.
No, the superconductors are not simple magnets.
What's on the tele then?
Rockets being the only solution does not automatically mean rockets are a viable solution. Please quit ignoring the real challenges presented.
Unfortunately, this can't be approached as an engineering problem and get the result you would like. It needs to be approached as a problem in fundamental research of the physics underlying our world.
There were lots of efforts to miniaturize the vacuum tube. They only resulted in smaller tubes. It took new insights in fundamental physics before people could understand how to make a transistor. There were many experiments with germanium (a natural semiconductor) that could have led to the transistor before 1947 if anyone had understood what was happening.
Some steel. Not all of them. That's why the refrigerator magnet doesn't stick to that silver door.
A field strong enough to work on water would kill you first.
Look at the amount of money made on oscillococcinum, and you might agree it's a successful hack to make money from the stupidity of others.
This would be cool if it was more than a stage trick. The superconductor needed to do this used to be mail-ordered from Edmund Scientific. So lots of hackers were doing levitation demonstrations in the 90's. People think it's cool because they've not lived through that, or have forgotten it.
It works on the principle of superconductors excluding a magnetic field. When they are cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures. Steel is low in ferromagnetism and isn't as good a conductor as copper so it's not as good for making electromagnets.
Well, I did that once with a bottle of liquid nitrogen from Airco and a superconductor I bought from Edmund Scientific. This was before there was a Slashdot. So, no, not impressive.
Before someone makes a working hoverboard, we will first hear about the principle that makes it possible. Because one that's practical is almost guaranteed to get someone a Nobel Prize. And certainly Lexus would go for that if they could.
No new principles lately. There is an existing principle of magnetic repulsion that would work only in an extreme condition. One requiring really special stuff buried in the street, and probably including liquid nitrogen to keep it working for even a short time and a few feet.
So, it's a gimmick.
So... An Osteoptath takes a "holistic" approach, and yet the treatment is only being used for certain musculosceletal conditions? How does only being useful only for that specific thing make an Osteopath more "holistic" exactly?
Of course, we haven't even gotten into the fact that osteopathy hasn't even been demonstrated to have an actual effect on musculoskeletal conditions...
What separates C++ beginners from those with 'intermediate' skills, or even masters?
Knowing when not to use templates, virtualization, [insert favorite c++ function here], etc.
Basically knowing enough about programming and problem solving with a particular language to tell a need from a want. Needing to use some language feature vs wanting to use some language feature. And being mature enough to stick to needs rather than indulge wants.
Or to state things differently
Think as a C programmer, (the kiss principal) and recast your solution into C++. Its not hard to convert structure manipulation into manipulation of an object. In effect, think simple, think about the next programmer who will be pulling his hair out trying to understand what the templates, castings, and obtuse code is doing.
Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't hesitate to ask!