Comment Re:Not All Batman Major Motion Pictures (Score 1) 157
Everything was not perfectly back in place and functioning! None of the security council members was speaking his own language!
Everything was not perfectly back in place and functioning! None of the security council members was speaking his own language!
I agree. And for web game developers, Flash is still the best tech out there. HTML5 is okay, but still not terribly mature (and don't get me started on sound) or consistently implemented. Meanwhile on the Flash platform you have at least two mature, useful frameworks--FlashPunk and Flixel--that allow for quick prototyping and rich development.
Not to mention AS3 is prettier and friendlier than Javascript...
What about authors? Books generally take more time to produce than music does, and you won't see nearly as many people buying tickets for reading or speaking engagements...
Should that same argument not then be applied equally to all makers of software? The issue is the same: effort is put into something novel which is nonetheless easily reproduced after the original idea is implemented. When put that way, the same argument should abolish all patents as well--after all, the idea once created is easily transmitted, so anyone who wants to make the effort to reproduce whatever invention the idea was for should be able to do so.
That doesn't make sense. If it did, mental hospitals would be our greatest source of art and science.
I agree with some of this. To illustrate the point in the realm of art, creativity is not painting an image of a dog with a human's head, even if that were never done before. It is, however, being the first to use light and shadow instead of painting a flat fresco.
If we thought about how hard it is to solve some of the social interactionss from the point of view of instructing computer to perform those tasks, perhaps we would see this in another way.
Is that metric really valuable? It's hard to teach a squirrel to jump through a hoop on command; does that mean it's hard for a human to do the same?
What most people recognize as genius, is often at best labled "creative", since if it were beyond the understanding of others, then it is likely going to go unrecognized.
I disagree. Genius lies not in discovering things that others cannot necessarily understand, it is more a matter of discovering things that others have not understood. Take Einstein's relativity, for instance--the ideas presented by it have entered the popular culture to a degree that is rather surprising. No, not every lay person has an intimate grasp of the details, but certainly every curious person, and increasingly everyone who watches Hollywood movies, knows about time dilation, the fixed speed of light, etc. The concepts themselves, at least a lot of them, are not intuitive but neither are they incomprehensible. To discover them however took a monumental work of intellect, effort, true creativity and curiosity--therein lies the genius.
I would describe it as pleasant. I've had it four or five times, and for me, if there are friends present, it results in a going-away feeling accompanied by uncontrollable laughter. The one time I did it by myself, the going-away feeling was there, and instead of hilarity I felt very still and tranquil. There are a lot of people who don't like the drug, and it is a psychedelic so set and setting play an important role. It's also not a party drug, not something to do to "have a good time."
Also, salvia has been prohibited by several US states, with legislation moving through a number of others to do the same.
Why not ban all mind-altering substances except for a whitelist? Say alcohol, caffeine, nicotene are legal. Everthing else illegal. IANAL but that would seem to solve the legal problem.
...prozac, ambien, adderall, ritalin, aspirin, tylenol, zyperxa, effexor, xanax, vicodin...
Don't fall prey to the fallacy of the single cause. There was also Dupont, who wanted nylon to replace hemp. There were also racist motivations: making marihuana illegal was a good way to deport the Mexican laborers who were "stealing our jobs" and the Negro musicians who were "corrupting our youth." I'm sure there are a number of other fringe reasons for making it illegal.
Also, it actually started with the Marihuana Tax Act, in which farmers could only grow hemp if they bought stamps to do so from the government. The government didn't sell any stamps. The scheduling came later.
A lot of the change you are experiencing may be due to selection for THC over other cannabinoids in a lot of breeds. It's not necessarily that it's more potent, it's that the ratio of THC tends to be higher because THC is erroneously thought of as "the active ingredient." There are a lot more incidences of paranoia in people who take THC pills for pain relief than there are for medical marijuana users who smoke or ingest the plant. The "mellow luvving feeling" is a result of a more balanced bouquet.
Ass, Ass. There, I got the other two you missed.
Health effects are not a red herring at all. There have been cases of GMO food causing allergy problems. For instance, here is an article from the New England Journal of Medicine showing the effects of transgenic soybeans created by Pioneer Hi-Bred which contain a gene from the brazil nut. You don't even need to read the article; just look at the image of the allergic reaction caused by skin-prick testing of extracts from the GMO bean on a person who is allergic to brazil nuts.
And hell, some of Monsanto's corn is registered and patented as a pesticide! There was a recent article here which puts the blame for colony collapse disorder squarely on the use of HFCS from Monsanto corn to feed bees--the trace amounts of pesticide in the corn syrup are enough to make the bees get lost while foraging. This particular pesticide appears harmless to humans; it's been used since the '30s, but it is an illustration of how unintended consequences come into play.
What GMO essentially means is that you have no idea what kinds of genes are in your food, and you will continue to have no idea unless you have an allergic reaction. That's not great, but there could also be long-term effects that will remain unknown for years or decades--a little bit like the radiation craze before we realized it promotes cancer. And there could also be secondary effects: round-up ready crops are meant to be sprayed, and they're going to get hit with a lot more herbicides than non-GMO crops. The use of these crops has been widespread for under a decade. I think it makes sense to remain cautious on the health front as well.
The monoculture is almost certainly the larger issue, and my intention is not to detract from it. I have heard that something like 97% of the varieties of food we grew in the 19th century are now extinct. There are less than 10 kinds of potatoes widely grown, down from 500, and these kinds of numbers are seen across the board. That's not a good idea.
You're probably right about There Will Be Blood. The interesting thing is that the lines from the movie were based on reality:
"I must admit to you where that came from," Anderson says giddily, noting that the eccentric metaphor comes straight from the congressional transcripts of the 1920s "Teapot Dome" scandal, in which New Mexico Republican Senator Albert Fall was convicted of accepting bribes for the oil-drilling rights to public lands in California and Wyoming from several oil-industry fat cats (including Edward Doheny).
I wondered a bit about that myself, but my intent was only to report what was missing from the summary. Is quartz used as a generator? I know it's often used as a timing oscillator, but if my understanding is correct it requires a bit of power to do so.
Love makes the world go 'round, with a little help from intrinsic angular momentum.