Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Apathy (Score 1) 223

Americans seem to have a better chance at shaming the NFL into dealing with Ray Rice than they do at shaming the government to do something about the NSA.

Pissed off customers have the potential to lead to empty seats and lost profits. Pissed off citizens... well, you might get less votes if the "other guys" seem a little better, but the "other guys" are really part of the same system and many of the entrenched interests don't actually change when a different party is voted in.

Comment Abuses of communism (Score 1) 540

Yes, because in the U.S. you'd never have for-profit prisons, civil forfeiture, or even outright cops stealing cash under the pretence of fighting crime.

The U.S. certainly wouldn't have issues with police beating minorities or killing them, leading to riots. They wouldn't have a growing number of cases of false imprisonment, or police militarization

Comment Idea VS game (Score 1) 368

Minecraft as a "concept" is great. A fairly open, semi-dynamically generated world. A focus on (generally cooperative) construction and innovation rather than blowing sh** up. In later versions, some fairly serious modding capabilities.

There's definitely some value in the player-base, but in terms of the code-base? The *idea* behind MC was new and is what makes it great, but I don't know that the code itself would be particularly difficult to reproduce or even improve upon. Other than artwork and some specific mechanics, I don't see what's copyrightable that would prevent an improved offshoot. At the moment, it's mainly "we've sunk a lot into MC and it's been good enough," but if MS starts shenanigans that might change dramatically.

Comment Re:Captcha rate limiting error message? (Score 1) 142

Ah, that one would make sense to me.
I still think the stupidest part would be having *any* anonymous server with direct access to the internet. I'd assume that - in order to know the hosts IP - it actually had a public IP address.

Firewall, then server. Server gets a NAT'ed address, and only implicitly allowed connections make it through the firewall/NAT. It should never even know what the public IP is.

Comment Home server (Score 1) 363

A lot of ISP's ban home servers if - par example - you're divvying out content to the internet (though often not unless you're caught, those port 25 and/or 80 blocks are also common).

However, a lot of "home servers" these days are just media boxen used to personal consumption. The cloud-enabled ones usually have some service for allowing remote-access as well. Geeks may have a file/media server along with maybe a game host of some type, which doesn't necessarily break the TOS for the ISP.

Slashdot Top Deals

Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes

Working...