Wikipedia has a mobile verson, just not a website. it's an app.
They have a mobile website. I get it everytime I go there from a mobile device. Rather annoyingly handicapped site at that, but uses the screenspace a lot better than the desktop version.
You miss the main point. It's easier to monetize on their OS because their OS reports a whole lot more information to them than another OS.
Unless you voluntarily provides them that data by using their special browser.
It's absolutely fucking insane that a business based on calling someone for a ride makes those with political power shit themselves with attempts to shut it down. Absolutely insane.
That is not the problem. The problem is that Uber is organizing crime, and continues to do so after beeing caught and fined once already.That is kind kind of a bad thing.
Yeah, but they have to go to DAB+ not DAB. And Norway being one of the first countries with DAB, started with the old standard which is just MP2 over radio, and doesn't even have error-correction. Plain DAB is plain shit and works nowhere.
As always there is an xkcd comic that answers your question in a nice and easy to understand fashion.
I leave it to you to find the relevant link
I am sure in-flight Wi-Fi can be used by pedophiles to watch child porn! And by terrorists to plan terror attacks!!!
OMG!! We must ban it
The old version has the zoom controls where they should be and has less zooming animations and is much clearer to use all respects.
Yeah, the new one is the slashdot beta of google maps. It might be "more modern", but in reality it is just more broken.
But why? It seems counter to business interests. The more people using your hardware, the better, yes? So why try to restrict that in any way whatsoever?
Some of their most expensive hardware is almost identical to their cheapest ones, with the main difference being what the driver allows.
IIRC, This has always been the case.
The news is that NVidia's behavior is getting worse.
Then lets avoid picking on Scientology and revoke tax exempt status for all churches.
Leaving aside the problems this would likely pose under American law
Taxing donations does not restrict your right to exercise your religion in any way. And tax-exempt charity organizations has the same kind of restrictions as they do in Germany.
They are NOT considering it. They are considering putting it on the books. There is a difference there. French gov already spies on everything that they can.
On their own citizens against their own laws. Then it would make no sense to change the laws.
Also. You are making a strong claim.. Prove it.
Really? Which nation(s) goverment do you think is not doing all that they can to stop terrorists as well as enemy nations?
None, but that has nothing to do with uselessly wasting resources on violating your citizens privacy which is what we are discussing.
The citizens vote to elect the two parliament chambers members, representing proportionally the states and the peoples. Then the parliament (all members of the two chambers) vote to appoint the 7 Federal Council members. There can appoint any citizen of the country even it's not a candidate. As strange as it look like, yes this has happened: a citizen without high view on the politic can be boosted up to the highest level in a few hours. The main goal is to form a stable Federal Council with a proportional diversity of the leading parties. Then 7 Federal Council members decide by them self there minister assignation between them.
That is how democracy works. That is no different from any other country in Europe. You still need to get around the problem of selecting a person the parliament can vote on. They can't vote on everybody.
Elect yes. But appoint? No, how would a group appoint. The way it works in most countries is that the head of government appoints and the parliament approves.
It's only a democratic country because there can vote for the king, but the king choose the ministers and the ministers can do anything. The parliament is a joke to keep some credibility that some discussion exists. The citizen are left with there problems and never take seriously.
The french president have had a lot of power since thr 50s, but appointing the government (or administration as Americans put is) is alwsys the primary responsibility of the head of government. The same happens in all states. Prime ministers to presidents all do that.
Hacking's just another word for nothing left to kludge.
