Journal Journal: Call me an idiot. 3
But I started messing around with
A little background, I've been in the technical support field for over 10 years. The first server OS I worked with was Xenix, supporting a canned app for a chain of florists. I've gone through Novell from Personal Netware to 5.1 (still haven't worked with 6). All the incarnations of MS "server" and Happily install Linux at a client site when I get the opportunity to.
I run win2k on the desktop at home but all my usenet binaries downloading, irc, email and development stuff are done on my various linux boxes.
Anyway, I signed up to download rc1 of
1. the install, didn't quibble on any of the hardware on my HP lpr netserver with a rs/8 attached. Everything looked like the win2k install
2. Fluffy XP desktop had to go, opted for the "classic" windows desktop
3. it boots fast! of course after the server HW takes about 5 minutes to initialize before loading the OS.
4. Nothing is enabled by default. No webservices, ftp, smtp,pop3.
5. Did I say POP3? yes they actually include a POP3 mailserver. Does this mean they are admitting exchange is a failure? I have yet to test that feature to anylength. but it does integrate with AD and all the other stuff.
6. Compatability mode for apps developed on older platforms. I don't know how well this will work, but if it's good a patch needs to be made for Win2k.
I still have some beefs with it.
1. Still has the same POS EULA and product activation that winxp has, wont be a problem in a big corporate enviro, but might cause some problems in smaller shops.
2. Still see no reason to have a GUI enabled by default on a server OS. needs to be a way to turn it off or load it. CLI at the console would be great, especially if you don't want to be there long. Just having the OPTION would rule.
3. still runs IIS, havn't tried apache on it, but might once it gets closer to release date and there are more builds or source tailored for it.
Eh who knows it might sell a few copies when it gets released.