Comment Re:Is Snowden being tried? (Score 1) 261
I never even said a word about the lawyers making money. Perhaps you meant to reply to someone else?
I never even said a word about the lawyers making money. Perhaps you meant to reply to someone else?
Everyone needs many lawyers at all stages.
More seriously, a child -- even a stupid child -- could tell that Snowden faces legal threats, among other threats. It's not foolish of him to consult with lawyers. Besides, you think there are no lawyers out to get him?
I mean, we can't all have 6-digit Slashdot IDs
Who would want a six digit Slashdot ID? How dreadful!
I believe that the episode you're thinking of was Time Flight. They put the TARDIS aboard a Concorde and flew 140 million years into the past.
Plus don't forget that the domestic telephone network exists nationwide. Even if airlines were magically exempt, telephones still could be regulated.
Hey, I'm totally happy with getting rid of as many jobs as possible through automation, so long as people still get paid enough to live comfortably. The leisure society is where it's at.
This isn't a problem that is limited to the USA.
I live in New Zealand and have a workshop on the local airfield.
Of the 9 hangars at the airfield, only two now have airworthy aircraft in them -- and most of those are home-built or microlite types rather than GA craft (like Cessnas).
Just about the only (semi) regular users of the runway are flight schools which train pilots for overseas airlines such as EasyJeet and JetStar.
The skyrocketing cost of maintaining a PPL combined with hikes in just about every other cost associated with flying has really seen the amount of activity plummet.
Even the local CAA (our equivalent of the FAA) field officer told me he's not going to renew his pilot's license because of the costs.
On the up-side.... the whole issue of drones being integrated into the national airspace may soon be made a lot easier -- since there'll be far fewer full-sized craft in that airspace anyway
But ours are all stuck at the bottom of a big gravity well. Materials mined on the moon, or better yet, nearby asteroids, are not. They could be sent down to us as raw materials to be turned into finished goods here, but alternatively we could begin to industrialize space.
There are plenty of plans on the books for building solar power arrays that could send power down to us cleanly, for example. It's too expensive to build them with parts that come from the Earth, but it might be more practical with parts that didn't.
It has plenty of oxygen and aluminum, which would be useful. Near Earth asteroids are probably a better bet, however.
How could that have possibly happened, given that in 1994, a runaway planet hurtled between the Earth and the Moon, breaking the moon into two big chunks, unleashing cosmic destruction, and casting man's civilization into ruin.
And while it would be good to get rid of mining operations on Earth, replacing it with space mining, the main advantage of mining in space is that you do not need to use a giant rocket to get that stuff into space; it's already up there, and can be used for industrial purposes in situ.
Returning to the days of snake oil is not the solution.
Take a look at the market in "herbal supplements & remedies". Snake oil never really left, just got a free pass as long as they slap a tiny disclaimer on the bottle or TV screen.
You realize the Scientific American article that you point to backs up the OP's point? Let me quote the article summary directly:
"whereas female brains are more connected between hemispheres to combine analytical and intuitive thinking"
So, women are supposedly more wired to perform analytical and intuitive thinking? And what is coding and software engineering, exactly? It's certainly not a showcase for men's supposedly superior motor skills!
I don't believe many parents (there are a few) who directly point their children away from STEM. But I know a lot of parents and family and friends who indulge all day in Disney Princesses and makeover parties and introduce their peers to the wonders of staying connected all day to social media.
It's not malignant, but there is a social bias present. It may not have been in your immediate family, but taken as an aggregate, social pressure does steer little girls' interests away from STEM. And interests often turn into exploration for careers.
Trademarks are fine, of course.
Who gives you the right to say what I should or should not do with my creations?
You didn't create the copyright. Everyone else gave it to you (via our servant, the government). We didn't do this out of the kindness of our hearts; we did it out of self interest. And being a deal made out of self interest, and with you having no real alternatives or bargaining power, it should favor us very strongly.
If you don't like it, don't create anything, and don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
No consistency, no canon, nothing.
Of course there would be a canon. In fact, there might be several different ones. And fans could choose whichever they liked best. God knows this is already common with copyrighted materials.
Not to mention of course that even the Biblical Canon is not universally agreed upon, but somehow the world hasn't ended.
suppose its 1982, Return of the Jedi hasn't even been made yet.. is it really time to open the flood gates and let anyone anywhere make their own star wars direct to DVD sequels?
If you could make a DVD sequel to Star Wars in 1982 (remember, you can't use anything added in Empire!) then I'd say that you deserve to make it. Put those Laserdisc and Selectavision guys in their place!
What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance?