As a monopolist you don't -want- any innovation.
Why do you say this?
...but not before the customer service representative pressed him for eight solid minutes (audio) to explain his reasoning for leaving "the number one provider of TV and internet service in the country"...
Slight correction: the customer service representative pressed him for a further eight solid minutes.
He'd already been on the call for ten minutes before they started the recording!
It's always, without exception, a strategic move by the PR department, to encourage public chatter about some product.
As someone who actually had a product (they owned and managed) leak, I can tell you that it is never "always" a strategic move.
This might be orchestrated by the Microsoft PR team, but please don't assume that every leak is.
In iOS, when the factory reset is performed the key is removed so when the phone is reset and tied to a new account a new key is generated which is unable to access the old content. I'd rather the content was erased first, just in case some exploit is uncovered that can get at that key, but it's better than what Android has.
To expect an Android user to know that they must first encrypt the phone then do a factory reset if they want their data actually erased is absurd. Does Google not share the same view as the public on what the phrase "factory reset" actually means?
This (along with the all or nothing approach to app permissions) is something Google's PHDs really need to sort out.
I'd like a very *simple* smart watch...
* Simple caller-ID and memo display, programmable shortcut buttons, nothing else.
* Very long charge life comparatively (2 weeks would be okay) and/or very easy charging (put it on a charging pad).
Closest I can think to those requirements are the Casio G-Shock Bluetooth models. Two year battery life and notifications for most of the common things you'd want. A comparison chart can be found here.
Unfortunately they don't really go so well with a suit - although I don't suspect that will be a problem for the majority of Slashdot readers.
It also features a built-in headphone amplifier, beamforming microphone, a multi-core Sound Core3D audio processor, and various proprietary audio technologies.
If you need that kind of stuff then, sure, it's probably a good investment.
I don't and, as a result, haven't bought soundcard since 1996. The ones that came with my various motherboards have been just fine.
The laptops you mentioned aren't selling well because consumers are repelled by Windows 8, the design of most Windows laptops right now is dreadful, and Apple's marketing is ferocious.
Sales of computers running Windows have been in decline for may years now. In April, IDC reported that world-wide shipments of laptops and desktops fell 14% in the first quarter from a year earlier. That is the sharpest drop since IDC began tracking this data in 1994 and marks the fourth straight quarter of declines.
Even if all the issues you identified were resolved, I don't believe that it would reverse that trend.
One of Microsoft's main goals with Windows 9, the next major version of Windows, is to win over Windows 7 hold outs
If you're a true Windows 7 "hold out" then you won't be moving to a new operating system until that goes out of extended support in January 2020.
Working on one new update every two years, once extended support ends then it'll probably be Windows 11 that Microsoft will want those hold outs to move to, certainly not Windows 9.
Gee, Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.