Comment Re:This is good (Score 2) 1094
For a country that are smart about so many things their social structure is just broken.
You're confusing the structure of the society with the impact of certain cultures within that society.
For a country that are smart about so many things their social structure is just broken.
You're confusing the structure of the society with the impact of certain cultures within that society.
I'm always amazed that Americans are so poorly paid, and have terrible work conditions
And I'm always amazed that people think the condition of one American is the condition of all Americans. I have it on good authority that there is homeless street person in Berlin. I'm amazed that Germans have no homes and live in the street! Right? Right.
What you should be amazed by is that there are subcultures in the US that still haven't figured out that treating school like a chore to be avoided, and one's own children like an annoying stray dog to be left outside do its own devices results in
Entry-level, minimum wage jobs aren't supposed to be careers. It's the sort of thing a high school kid or college freshman should be holding while getting ready for a real life. When some poor kid is born into an uneducated household with only one parent sticking around, and attends (for a little while) a school where the kids all agree that learning to do things like communicate clearly and think critically is for chumps, and the real local power structure is a spectrum of street gangs and thugs
Net Neutrality says that no service can be prioritized over another (Netflix over Hulu for example).
Which is why some idiot will find a way to complain that using a shorter/faster path to overwhelmingly popular name servers (like Google's, as opposed to very sleepy servers run by smaller operations) will some how be Eeeevil, despite it greatly speeding up life for all sorts of people and services.
We'll know for certain when Texas executes a corporation.
Like Enron? Or Arthur Anderson?
Stock valuations are based not only on actual assets, but future growth and earnings potential. If I buy company X, it's because I think company X has a good product, business plan, and management and is going to be able to grow faster than inflation and faster than their competitors. I certainly don't want them to liquidate their current assets and give me my money back.
You've missed an important detail. They're not comparing the stock valuation to the assets alone. They're comparing the stock valuation to what the company would sell for if purchased. When you sell a company, you're also selling the "good will" and other value inertia things like brand familiarity, the value that will come from having the company in the future, etc.
The Breitbart bits at the end of TFS politicize what would have otherwise been a mediocre Sunday Slashdot submission.
So the fact that she actually did those things makes talking about them political? Or does pretending she didn't do them and talking around them make the conversation political? Hillary-centric submissions that wish away her behavior are the politicized ones.
So, it appears that you are just one link in the chain intended to bind "consumers" into acting as you wish them to act - that is, to provide you with ever more money.
Since you don't actually do anything for a living, how do you bind other people into being your slaves and giving you food, housing, and the rest? Genuinely curious. Please be specific.
In the meantime, what is your specific problem with someone playing the roll of tending to the hosting environment that supports other people's web sites? You seem to think it's sinister to charge people for the professional service of managing that part of their IT landscape
So - shut up and get to work. BTW - WTF have you produced that I might be interested in? Anything? Gimme a link, and I'll tell you what I think it is worth.
If I thought you were part of my audience, or (more importantly, for me) the audience that my clients' customers intend to cultivate, and you weren't already aware of their content, products, or services, then I'd have something to think about. This isn't the venue for that, even if you were the slightest bit sincere.
Your attitude need not be passed on. YOU are the one with a sense of entitlement.
What? I'm the who foots the bill if I want something, want to risk resources to make something, or make poor choices. The people with whom I'm debating here want what I and/or my clients do for free, but also think that the source of money that provides it to them should be cut off, all because they think - among other things - that it costs "$5 to run a web site." It's possible you don't actually know what "entitled" means, especially in this context.
Funny, I run my own business.
Hilarious.
If you feel that I'm violating your rights by skipping ads, I guess I'll see you in court.
Not worth the trouble. But it is worth pointing out that you're a whiny leech. In my experience, people who conduct themselves that way in one area do so in other areas, as well. Which is why this sort of thing especially matters. People with a sense of entitlement tend to want others to do everything for them, not just create and host web content. I can tell you're one of those people.
Setting up a web site and typing some shit isn't all that complicated or expensive.
Really. That's what you think is involved in running a business? In producing enough content for the people who do so to actually earn a living? Nobody's entitled to a living, but that doesn't mean you should deliberately kid yourself that the overhead involved in running a high profile web presence is
You can just run a web site on any old PC, too.
Really? I run web sites. For a living. One of them involves two rack cabinets full of equipment, and more that's mirrored a thousand miles away. There are about 40 servers involved (some physical, some virtual), redundant storage, physical security, substantial redundant power and network operations, and people involved who absolutely do not want the back end databases to live on "the cloud" or operate in a massive multi-tenant platform like AWS or Azure. Let me guess
And no, a browser/server protocol like HTTP doesn't trump copyright considerations, trademarks, or other terms of use. Just like the protocol for opening the door to a retail store ("push, with hand, walk in") doesn't grant you license to walk out with whatever you like once you've done so.
So arrest me.
Just pointing out that you're a whiny douchebag leach, and a hypocrite. You're the one who has to live with yourself. Everyone else just has to work a little harder to make up for your sense of entitlement, that's all. Please don't vote or reproduce. Thanks.
Is your job running? You'd better go catch it!