AFTER I said "the patent issuance delays are not random .. anyone skilled in the art knows how to manipulate it." You said
"There are reasons we manipulate delays - for example, where the patent owner is unsure whether to proceed with the application or not, and wants to stall while they release their product or talk to investors - but to get increased patent term extension is not one of them. "
So you admit that the delays can be manipulated, yet patent term extensions aren't a reason. This strongly implies that an applicant has no interest in having a delayed issue date.
It only strongly implies it if you don't bother reading the quote, considering the quote explicitly lists times when the application may have an interest. Try again.
1. A greatly delayed issue date can result in a term extension.
... if the delay was by the USPTO, rather than the applicant.
2. You state that applicants/their lawyer have ways to cause patent issuance delays.
... such delays being by the applicant, rather than the USPTO.
3. You say that applicants have no interest in a term extension.
I say that #2 is not done for the purpose of patent term extension, since the applicant doesn't get one, under #1. This is not complicated.
Also, your reasoning that applicants merely want to stall while they talk to investors or decide whether to proceed makes no sense. They've already paid the fees, why would they need to stall or not proceed with an application?
Cost to respond to an office action may be $4-6k. Cost to get an extension is $180 for the first month. They can spend $180 to take an extra month to decide whether to spend $4-6k.
Unless we are talking about a situation where they are concerned about trade secrets, there is no reason for someone to not want a patent.
Unless patents aren't free. Hint: they aren't.