Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - With Tumbling Oil Prices, Who Wins and Who Loses?

HughPickens.com writes: The price of oil is now under $70 a barrel after OPEC decided it would not cut back production significantly in the months ahead and the latest OPEC move suggests that it isn’t going to reverse course anytime soon.. Now Neil Irwin reports in the NYT that the falling price of oil looks likely to be one of the dominant forces shaping the global economy in 2015. So who wins and who loses? Winner: Global consumers as anybody who drives a car or flies on airplanes gets lower prices for gasoline and jet fuel. Loser: American oil producers — One of the big open questions is just how many of the small, independent producers in the American heartland will still be viable with oil prices in the $60s rather than the $100s. Many have relied on borrowed money, and bankruptcies are possible. Loser: Vladimir Putin — Russia’s economy is already facing its sharpest challenges in years, as Western sanctions imposed after Russian aggression toward Ukraine crimp the nation’s ability to be integrated in the global economy. Russia is a major energy producer, and the falling price of oil compounds the challenge facing its president, Vladimir Putin.

Potential Loser: The environment. As a general rule, the cheaper fossil fuels become, the more challenging it will be for cleaner forms of energy like solar and wind power to be competitive on price. But solar and wind power are sources for electricity, whereas fluctuations in oil prices most directly affect the price of transportation fuels like gasoline and jet fuel. Unless or until more Americans use electric cars, they are largely separate markets, so there’s no reason that cheaper oil should cause a major reduction in investment in renewables. The average pump price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the United States was $3.12 this week, down from $3.80 in October 2012 and down from $3.70 just four months ago. In the past, cheaper gasoline has two environmentally problematic effects: It leads people to drive thirstier cars and trucks and to drive them more miles. This time may be different. The number of miles Americans drive per capita has declined for nine straight years dropping from roughly 10,100 miles in 2004 to about 9,400 miles in 2013. A change that significant suggests a change in lifestyle—one that would be hard to upend. In addition, the average fuel economy of new cars and trucks sold in the United States has increased markedly over the past decade—in contrast to the 1990s, when new-vehicle fuel economy essentially flat-lined. Today, the average new car sold in this country goes 36 miles on a gallon of gasoline, up from 29.5 mpg in 2004. "Times have changed since the dawn of the last era of cheap oil," says Jeffrey Ball. "Even assuming low oil prices are the new normal, a cleaner energy system probably is too."

Comment Re:STEM is for suckers.. at least now. (Score 1) 454

Yes, business and finance can make more money than engineers. It's much easier to rake in the profits by convincing people to pay 2x - 4x more for crap than it is to make the crap 5% cheaper. Still, I'd rather do the engineering work. $100k+ is way more than enough to lead a happy life. My financial advisors look way the fuck stressed out.

OTOH I don't think the conventional wisdom has changed much from when I graduated.... companies still seem to prefer to hire STEM engineers, and then put them through business school to make managers and, er, "financial manufacturers" and whatnot out of them. The math is all the same, it's easier to train them, they're more ethical and loyal, so they won't steal from you and don't mind if you work them like dogs. Pure businessheads are probably going to be looking out for their own interests first and will take advantage of the company as much as they can get away with.

Comment Re:Solid research there (Score 1) 338

Pretty impressive finding results from LinkedIn back in 2000, considering it didn't launch until 2003.

Heh, if you were really Dr. Who, you could find a way to make that happen :D

To be fair, LinkedIn has appeared to reach critical mass just within the past year or two (at least my account is finally exploding with people I've worked with in the past, similar to when I begrudgingly realized that people actually use Facebook way back when).

Also, if you RTFS, they address that in their research bias section. And if you're a LinkedIn luser, you might realize that eventually they goad you into uploading most of your employment history, so that's what they're probably digging into to get pre-2003 data.

Comment Re:I know this! (Score 1) 561

Heh, for one of the hack days at work I totally recreated that scene in minecraft... used the python plugin to attach switches to scripts, so we could turn services off and on and use glowstone to monitor health checks. Had a sheep dispenser hooked up to drop sheep into a glass-encased river every time user traffic hit the website.

Also was working on some kind of pipeline deployment visualization involving minecarts, but it was difficult to restock the carts and load livestock reliably at the time.

Comment Re:How did your senator vote? (Score 1) 445

That's cool... is there some sort of OKCupid interface to it yet, so you can see which representatives match your interests the best, and alerts you when they vote against what you say you're interested in?

Submission + - Canadians fighting to share details of "Canada's Steubenville." (thestar.com)

o_ferguson writes: Last year, Canada was rocked by allegations surrounding the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons, a teenager from Cole Harbour, Nova Scotia, who killed herself after being raped and having images if the assault circulated on social media by her classmates. While she reported the crime, and the photos were widely available, she receiving no help or justice, eventually committing suicide. Once this tragic case became known, Canadians demanded action, and police eventually re-opened their instigation, charging one participant with manufacturing child pornography for his role in photographing the assault. He eventually pled guilty, and received a very lenient sentence (one year supervision, no criminal record.)

However, one bizarre offshoot this prosecutorial tactic is that it effectively made it illegal to publish Rehtaeh's name in Canada, as child pornography laws there explicitly protect the names of victims whose assailants have been prosecuted. Her name, which had become a rallying call for Canadian activists against online bullying and sexual exploitation, was effectively removed from the general lexicon overnight.

Needless to say, the reaction from regular people has been swift, with many tanking to twitter in an open defiance of the ban and others moving to US-based sites where they can freely publish not just Rehtaeh's name, but the until-now highly protected names of her attackers. As in the Steubenville case, the actions of Anonymous have played a central role.

Comment Re:huh? (Score 1) 187

I don't understand... what would be unethical about this?

Forcing an Asian elephant to be a "mother" to another species, one that might harm her.

Forcing solitary existence on what appears to be a highly social species.

That, and often you'd need 100s of zygotes to create a few viable organisms that survive to adulthood.

Excerpt from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

For example, the cloned sheep Dolly was born after 277 eggs were used for SCNT, which created 29 viable embryos. Only three of these embryos survived until birth, and only one survived to adulthood.[11]

I think it's still worthwhile... not getting 'ethics' confused with 'morality'. But anyone who was bothered by Rei from Neon Genesis Evangelion may have an issue with this.

Submission + - NYC to replace most of its payphones with free gigabit WiFi in 2015

mrspoonsi writes: NYC announced its plans: LinkNYC — a network of 10,000 gigabit WiFi hotspots that will line the streets of all five boroughs of New York City. The project will replace all but a small handful of historic payphones with "Links," small towers equipped with WiFi, an Android tablet with select city-service apps and, of course, the ability to make phone calls. What's missing? The word pay: it's all free.

Comment Mod parent up (Score 1) 202

Thanks for that... I'm surprised that people on slashdot are calling for political solutions to political "problems" instead of technological solutions that do more to guarantee security and privacy against surveillance, be it "legal" or illegal.

I'll reserve my outrage for when using strong encryption becomes regulated.

Slashdot Top Deals

Modeling paged and segmented memories is tricky business. -- P.J. Denning

Working...